Page 333 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4

CPS2249 Azrin A. et al.
3. Conclusions
Basically, DOSM has implemented the core principles of microdata
dissemination accordingly. However, it will need to strengthen the metadata
dissemination of which it should be more comprehensive and can assist users
to understand better the data provided and produce an accurate output from
the analyses conducted. The metadata provided should explain in details the
definitions, concepts, coverage, variables description, history of the data,
statistical methods used, and etc. However, in terms of the implementation of
statistical disclosure, DOSM is preferable to widen the microdata
dissemination by giving access to users via remote data access. Currently,
DOSM offers a microdata access via a paltform namely StatsDW MyLab to
users. However, users are only allowed to access the platform at the DOSM
premise. In order for DOSM to open the access via a remote data access,
DOSM must put security as the highest aspects to focused on. Apart from this,
DOSM might have to empower and strengthen the Microdata Dissemination
Policy especially in defining the variables to be disseminate via the remote
data access platform. In maintaining the microdata confidentiality, it is
advisable to apply the SDL strategies accordingly which will require continued
and dedicated effort or even budgetary planning and funding. As a result,
DOSM will be able to fullfill the user's needs, at the same time, the information
confidentiality remained safeguarded.

References
1. Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities (2014). Microdata
Dissemination Best Practices.
2. Dalenius, T. and REISS, S. P. (1982). Data-swapping: A tech nique for
disclosure control. /. Statist. Plann. Inference 6 73-85.
3. Duncan, G. T., de Wolf, V. A., Jabine, T. B. and Straf, M. L. (1993). Report of
the panel on confidentiality and data access. J. Official Statistics 9 271-
274.
4. Fuller, W. A. (1993). Masking procedures for microdata disclo sure
limitation. /. Official Statistics 9 383-406.
5. Gomatam, S., Karr, A. F., Reiter, J. P., & Sanil, A. P. (2005). Data
dissemination and disclosure limitation in a world without microdata: A
risk-utility framework for remote access analysis servers. Statistical
Science, 163-177.
6. Gomatam, S., Karr, A. F. and Sanil, A. P. (2003). Data swap ping as a
decision problem. Unpublished manuscript.
7. Granda, P., & Blasczyk, E. (2010). Data Dissemination. Cross-cultural survey
guidelines.
8. Li Li (2006). Microdata Dissemination: What shouldn't be ignored to
improve the statistical capacity of China.

322 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9