Page 409 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 409

CPS2460 Mustafa Dinc et al.
            data. Together, these six steps comprise the core theoretical elements of our
            proposed measurement technology.

                Characteristics of the Statistical Performance Index (SPI)
                Constructing a measure of statistical capacity entails many distinct choices
            that can appear to be arbitrary and unrelated to one another if no context is
            provided. A set of desired characteristics, or criteria, can provide the guiding
            principles that help organize these choices to obtain a relevant and useful
            measurement tool. SPI is designed to satisfy seven criteria. The SPI should be:
                    1.  Simple. It must be understandable and easy to describe
                    2.  Coherent. It must conform to a common-sense notion of what is
                       being measured
                    3.  Motivated. It must fit the purpose for which it is being developed
                    4.  Rigorous. It must be technically solid
                    5.  Implementable. It must be operationally viable
                    6.  Replicable. It must be easily replicable
                    7.  Incentive Compatible. It must respect country incentives

                The SPI also satisfies three axioms. The symmetry axiom requires that the
            index value is unaffected when variable levels are switched. The dominance
            axiom requires that the index value rises whenever one variable rises from 0
            to  1  and  the  rest  of  the  variables  do  not  fall  in  value.  The  subgroup
            decomposability axiom allows the index to be divided into salient sub-indices
            and linked back to the original index for policy analysis.

                SPI Dimensions
                The production process for statistical outputs has certain similarities to the
            traditional production model from economics and begins with a technology
            that  is  used  in  generating  the  statistical  products,  and  the  level  of  this
            technology is clearly a relevant component of statistical capacity. The resulting
            statistical outputs might be divided into two general categories. First are the
            intermediate  products,  which  have  direct  use  for  specialists  but  require
            additional processing to create products suitable for general use. For example,
            a census can be helpful for policy analysts but must be processed to obtain
            useful statistics. Second are the final products, which are available in a form
            that can be understood by the public. The key macro statistics of a country
            would naturally be viewed as final products. Even after the products have been
            created, their existence does not imply that potential users will actually have
            access to them. Statistical products may be available to only a few users, or
            available to all. The final dimension then covers the extent to which statistical
            products are disseminated.
                This simple framework helps to identify four coherent dimensions for a
            measure  of  statistical  capacity,  namely:  (i)  Methodology,  Standards  and

                                                               398 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414