Page 171 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7
P. 171

CPS2055 Asanao S. et al.
                   Let   =  (  ) be the estimated risk score for the subject with   , and we
                                                                                 
                                
                        
               assume the high value of   represents the high risk of the event. There is a
                                          
               lot of measures to quantify how well the score   predicts the distribution of
                                                               
               the failure time, like explained variation-based measures and discrimination-
               based measures. The C-index is one of the representative measure among
               them. Let  (u) be the conditional survival probability for :
                          
                                         () = Pr( > | =  ).
                                         
                                                           
                                                                
                                                    
               For two independent subjects ( ,H  ) and ( ,H ), if the following inequalities
                                               
                                                  
                                                          
                                                             
               is satisfied, the pair is said to be concordant at :
                                                            ̂
                                                     ̂
                                         <   and  () <  ()
                                          
                                              
                                                     
                                                             
               or
                                                            ̂
                                                    ̂
                                         <   and  () <  () .
                                              
                                                            
                                                     
                                         
               In a same meaning, the pair is said to be concordant if the following is satisfied:
                                            <   and  > 
                                            
                                                 
                                                        
                                                             
               or
                                            >   and  <  .
                                            
                                                 
                                                        
                                                             
                   Based on the concordant pairs, the concordance probability is defined as
               follows:
                                      = Pr (H > H | <  ,  < ),
                                                              
                                              
                                                           
                                                   
                                                      
               where  is the max time point to evaluate . When the event time may be
               censored, the estimation of  is not simple. Harrell et al. (1996) proposed the
               measure  that  is  derived  as  Kendall’s  tau  for  censored  survival  data.  The
               measure uses only usable pairs in the observed sample:
                                        ∑  ( <  ,  ≤ )( >  )
                                                       
                                                
                                                     
                                                                     
                                         ,
                                                                
                                            
                                   ̂
                                   =                                 ,
                                   
                                            ∑  ( <  ,  ≤ )
                                                 
                                                            
                                                         
                                                     
                                              ,
               where ∑  = ∑  ∑   ≠  . This measure becomes the consistent estimator if there
                       ,
                              
               are  no  censoring.  However,  it  may  depend  on  the  censoring  distribution.
               Therefore, it is no clear what the effect of censoring.
                   As the modification of the censoring bias of Harrell’s C-index, Uno et al.
               (2011) proposed a new measure:
                                               −2
                                          ̂
                                   ∑  {( )} ( <  ,  ≤ )( >  )
                                                         
                                     ,
                                                            
                                                                         
                                             
                                                                     
                                                     
                                        
                              ̂
                               =                  −2                     ,
                               
                                               ̂
                                        ∑  {( )} ( <  ,  ≤ )
                                         ,
                                             
                                                  
                                                              
                                                         
                                                                 
                       ̂
               where  (. )  is  the  Kaplan-Meier  estimator  for  the  censoring  distribution
               () =  Pr(  >  ).
                   As the other modification of the bias of Harrell’s C-index, Begg et al. (2000)
               proposed the measure that uses the all pairs including the unusable pairs. In
               their approach, the concordance values for unusable pairs are replaced by
               estimates of conditional expectation of it:
                                              2
                                      ̂
                                       =  ( − 1) ∑ ( >  ) ,
                                                                  
                                                          
                                                               
                                       
                                                    ,
               where   is defined as follows:
                       
                                                                  158 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176