Page 168 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7

CPS2051 Mentje G. et al.
References
1. BCBS 196. (2011). “Operational Risk: Supervisory guidelines for the
advanced measurement approaches; Issued June 2011.” Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank of International Settlements.
2. Böcker, K., and Klüppelberg, C. (2005). “Operational VaR: a closed-form
approximation.” Risk 18(12), 90–93.
3. de Jongh, PJ, de Wet, T, Panman, K and Raubenheimer, H. (2016). “A
simulation comparison of quantile approximation techniques for
compound distributions in Operational Risk.” Journal of Operational
Risk, 11(1):23-48.
4. de Jongh, PJ, de Wet, T, Raubenheimer, H and Venter, JH. (2015).
“Combining scenario and historical data in the loss distribution
approach: A new procedure that incorporates measures of agreement
between scenarios and historical data.” Journal of Operational Risk,
10(1):1- 31.
5. Embrechts, P. and Hofert, M. (2011). “Practices and issues in operational
risk modelling under Basel II.” Lithuanian Mathematical Journal,
51(2):180–193
6. Panjer, H. (2006). Operational Risk: Modeling Analytics. Wiley,
Chichester.

155 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9