Page 192 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7
P. 192

CPS2057 Ana C. M. Ciconelle et al.
               common combination of CNV occurrences, in which, on average, 77.45% of
               the trios are all normal for all 8,794 CNVs. When we consider the case of one
               parent being normal and another having a deletion, we expected, under the
               Mendelian  law,  that  the  proportions  of  children  with  two  copies  would  be
               similar to the children with one deletion. However, on average, 7.52% of the
               trios has parents with one normal parent and another with single deletion and
               the mean frequency of the trios with offspring with deletion is 1.29%, while
               with normal offspring is 6.06%. It means that, in general, the affected parent
               transmits preferentially the normal allele instead of the allele with deletion. A
               similar situation can be found for trios in which one of the parents is normal
               and the other has one duplication.
                   Are the CNVs associated to height? Height is a complex phenotype and its
               heritability is estimated to be around 80%. Due to the missing heritability, we
               explored this phenotype in association with CNVs. A linear mixed model was
               applied  considering  height  as  response  variable  and  age,  sex,  ancestry
               coefficients and CNV as covariates. We adjusted the model in three different
               ways, in which the CNV was considered as dichotomous, having linear effect
               and as categorical covariate in five levels. Based on the results, the region from
               78,960,219bp to 78,967,224bp in chromosome 9 is the most significant among
               the CNVs. Figure 5 shows the Manhattan plot for the model with CNV as a
               discrete variable. Also, the results indicate that the presence of duplication
               decreases the expected height by approximately 3cm as show in Figure 6.






















                   Figure 5. Manhattan plot from the second model. y‐axis indicates the –log10 (p‐
                   value) of each CNV in association with height. The position used in the x‐axis is
                   the center position (in bp) of the CNV.










                                                                  179 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197