Page 189 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7
P. 189

CPS2057 Ana C. M. Ciconelle et al.
               positions of each SNP for each canonical genotype (AA, AB and BB). Then, the
               calculation of LRR and BAF values for each SNP and each sample are made. All
               these values are used by a hidden Markov model (HMM) to CNV calling for
               each sample. Quality control values are also generated. The identified CNV
               regions are specific for each sample (individual). We excluded the samples that
               do not pass in the quality control. Then, a new set of minimal regions, defined
               by the overlap regions across all samples, was built and all minimal regions
               with a low frequency of CNVs (less than 2%) were removed. The final minimal
               regions are then ready for the CNV analysis of this work.
                   The  SOLAR  package  combined  with  R  scripts  was  used  to  analyse  the
               CNVs,  calculate  the  heritability  of  traits  and  associate  CNVs  and  traits.
               Heritability corresponds to the intraclass correlation coefficient defined under
               linear mixed model formulation and considering family‐based designs.

































               Figure 1: Flowchart of the pipeline. Box I indicates CNV calling and box II indicates
               CNV  analysis.  The  number  indicates  which  function  was  used:  1  (apt‐probeset‐
               summarize)    and    2    (apt‐probeset‐genotype)   are   from    APT,    3
               (generate_affy_geno_cluster.pl),  4  (normalize_affy_geno_cluster.pl),  5  (kcolumn.pl),  6
               (detect_cnv.pl) e 7 (filter_cnv.pl) are from PennCNV, 8 (CNTools) is from bioconductor
               package cntools, 9, 10 and 11 are basic functions from R environment and SOLAR
               software.

               3.  Result
                   By  the  end  of  the  CNV  calling,  each  sample  has  a  file  describing  the
               identified  CNVs  as  showed  in  Table  1.  From  the  1,120  samples  910  were


                                                                  176 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194