Page 387 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7

CPS2138 RidaAgustina et al.
nutritional adequacy and freedom from chronic diseases and disability can
affect family physical resilience.

Dimensions of Economic Resilience
From the standardized solution results of SEM analysis, the dimensions of
economic resilience are known that the independent variables of family
income adequacy and family health insurance have SFLs below 0.50 which
means they are invalid and can be excluded from the model. Based on the
results of calculations, the initial CR value of the economic resilience
dimension is 0.79 (> 0.70) and VE is 1.51 (> 0.50). So, it can be concluded that
the reliability is good. The GOF value indicates that the overall suitability of
the initial model dimension of economic resilience is not good. Therefore,
based on the validity and reliability and suitability of the whole model, it can
be concluded that the model is not good, so it needs to be respected by
issuing invalid independent variables.
From the magnitude of the effects of each independent variable and
component of the variable, it can be concluded that the adequacy of family
income has a positive effect on the variable component of family income but
is much smaller than the family income per capita. In addition, family health
insurance has a smaller influence on family financial guarantees than family
savings variables. This shows that the continuity variable of children's
education and family health insurance can be excluded from the model
because the variable is invalid and has little effect on the component variables
and dimensions of economic resilience.
The respecification is done and a saturated model is obtained and has a
perfect fit where the variable component is omitted. The final results show that
the economic resilience dimension has the best model with three valid
independent variables namely home ownership, the ability to finance
children's education, and the continuity of children's education.

Dimensions of Social Psychological Resilience
The results of SEM analysis show that the independent variable of anti-
violence attitude towards women and anti-violence behaviour towards
children has an SFL greater than 0.50 which means the two independent
variables are valid. While the independent variable of respect for the law has
an SFL below 0.50 which means invalid. Based on the results of calculations,
the dimensions of social psychology resilience have a value of CR = 0.78 (>
0.70) and VE = 0.90 (> 0.50). So, it can be concluded that the reliability is good.
The invalid variable of respect for the law that is invalid is not in line with the
statement of MWECP (2016) regarding the effect of respect for law that affects
family resilience. From the suitability of the whole model, it seen that the value
of Chi Square (0,00) is very small with a p-value of 1.00 which means good fit.

374 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9