Page 388 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7

CPS2138 RidaAgustina et al.
In addition, the RMSEA value is also very small, which is 0.00 (<0.08) which
means good fit. The smallest AIC value (424,466) compared to other
respecification models is equal to saturated value. So, it can be concluded that
the model of respectiveness of the dimensions of psychological social
resilience with the independent variables of anti-violence against women and
anti-violence behaviour against children is the best model.

Dimensions of Socio-cultural Resilience
The results of SEM analysis showed that the three independent variables
were respect for the elderly, participation in social activities in the
environment, as well as participation in religious activities in the environment
having SFLs below 0.50 which meant that none of the independent variables
were valid. Based on the results of calculations, the dimensions of socio-
cultural resilience have a value of CR = 0.67 (<0.70) and VE = 0.84 (> 0.50). So,
it can be concluded that the reliability is not good. From the suitability of the
whole model, it can be seen that the value of Chi Square (0,00) is very small
with a p-value of 1.00 which means good fit. In addition, the RMSEA value is
also very small, which is 0.00 (<0.08) which means good fit. The AIC value is
quite small, which is 500.946 equal to the saturated value. So, it can be
concluded that the model of respectiveness of the dimensions of socio-
cultural resilience with the independent variable of respect for the elderly,
participation in social activities in the environment, and participation in
religious activities in the environment are the best models.

Latent Variable Score for Pioneer-Family Resilience Index(P-FRI) in 2015
Comparison of the values of P-FRI and FRI with valid and reliable
dimensions and indicators is done to find out whether there are differences
between the two index values. Based on analysis, there are differences in the
results of calculating the P-FRI with the Family Resilience Index with the valid
and reliable dimensions. The value of the Family Resilience Index with the valid
and reliable dimensions tends to be lower compared to P-FRI. The difference
between the two index values is between 0.24 to 11.35. This can be happened
because the independent variables used in the calculations are different. But
the values of the two indices are still in a range that is not much different,
between 56.00 and 79.00. It can be concluded that there is no significant
difference in the calculation of family resilience index using 6 indicators (SEM)
or 24 indicators (AHP).

375 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9