Page 104 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 104

CPS2205 Abdul Aziz A. Rahaman et al.
                  2.2.4 The Ordinal Logit Model
                      The following notation would employed in the model. Let  = Pr ( = 2)
                                                                               2
                                                                                       
                  denotes  the  probability  that  the  ith  individual's  outcome  belongs  to  the
                  second class; More generally,    = Pr( = ) denotes the probability that the
                                                        
                  ith individual's outcome belongs to the kth class. On the other hand when the
                  categories are ordered to assume that the log odds of   ≥  is linearly linked
                  with the predictor variables. The model is given by
                                                         
                                 log (    +⋯+  ) =  0  +          (6)
                                     1+⋯+ −1
                  Thus, we still have to estimate K 1 intercepts, but only p linear effects, where p is
                  the number of explanatory variables (note that  +  − 1 < ( − 1)( + 1)  >
                  2.
                  2.2.5 Goodness of Fit Test for Structural Equation Model
                      A large class of omnibus tests exists for determining overall model fit. The
                  χ2 statistic is often used, for which the null hypothesis indicates how close the
                  default model is to the data set used.
                  2.2.6 Goodness-of-Fit Test for Ordinal Logit Model
                      From  the  observed  and  expected  frequencies,  the  usual  Pearson  and
                  Deviance goodness-of-fit measures can be computed. The Pearson goodness-
                  of-fit statistic is
                                                    2
                                     2
                                     = ΣΣ (   −  )          (7)
                                                

                  3.  Result
                      Asymptotically  distribution  free  method  was  adopted  for  parameter
                  estimation to justify data set used. Measurement model and structural model
                  test were used to test fitness of the model.




















                            Figure 1: Outcome of Hypothesised Structural Model
                      Figure 1 depicted the empirical results of structural model by path analysis.
                  The path coefficients of the latent constructs are visualized in Figure 1. The
                  empirical results found significant positive relationship among service quality,


                                                                      93 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109