Page 14 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 14

CPS2144 Laura Antonucci et al.
                                  Dij = (Xij(post) −Xij(pre),Yij(post) −Yij(pre), Zij(post) −Zij(pre)),


                    i = 1,...,n and j ∈{apex, entry point}. Formalizing we are interested in testing
                  the following system of hypotheses
                                        H0: Pj,post = Pj,pre          ∀j
                                        H1: Pj,post ≠ Pj,pre         for at least one j
                  where Pj,post  and Pj,pre are the multivariate distributions of responses post and
                  presurgery  respectively,  and  j  ∈  {apex,  entry  point}.  If  we  assume  in  both
                  groups the multivariate errors of positioning to be normally distributed, an
                  unconditional solution is represented by the parametric paired Hotelling T 2
                  test. However, this distributional assumption may not be true, and departures
                  from  this  assumption  can  potentially  lead  to  incorrect  conclusions.
                                     2
                  Furthermore,  the  T test  fails  to  provide  an  easily  implemented  one-sided
                  (directional)  hypothesis  test  (Blair  et  al.,  1994)  and  it  does  not  allow  to
                  investigate on partial aspects involved (marginal coordinates), giving only a
                  global result. It is also worth to underline that patients enrolled in this study
                  were not randomly selected, that is one of the assumptions regarding the
                  validity of Hotelling T test. For this reason, we used the permutation test and
                                       2
                  in  particular  the  nonparametric  combination  methodology  described  in
                  Pesarin  and  Salmaso  2010.  Permutation  tests  are  conditional  inferential
                  procedures in which conditioning is with respect to the sub-space associated
                  with the set of sufficient statistics in the null hypothesis for all nuisance entities,
                  including  the  underlying  known  or  unknown  distribution.  A  sufficient
                  condition for properly applying permutation tests is that the null hypothesis
                  implies that observed data are exchangeable with respect to groups. When
                  exchangeability  may  be  assumed  in  H0,  the  similarity  and  unbiasedness
                  property allow for a kind of weak extension of conditional to unconditional
                  inferences, irrespective of the underlying population distribution and the way
                  sampling data are collected. Therefore, this weak extension may be made for
                  any sampling data, even if they are not collected by welldesigned sampling
                  procedure  (Pesarin,  2002).  Permutation  tests  do  not  require  assumptions
                  and/or approximations that may be difficult to meet in real data. In order to
                  solve  the  global  hypothesis  testing  we  have  to  face  separately  but
                  simultaneously - the two (multivariate) testing problems (one for each j   {
                  apex,  entry  point})  and  then  combining  them  through  the  nonparametric
                  combination  (NPC)  methodology  (Pesarin  and  Salmaso,  2010).  A  detailed
                  description of the algorithm used is described in (Antonucci et all 2019).






                                                                       3 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19