Page 17 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8

CPS2144 Laura Antonucci et al.
on partial aspects, we can see that in the front part there are significant

differences for the Y-coordinate both at the apex and at the entry point (pXapex
= 0.11 and pXentry point = 0.60). In the back part of the mouth there is significant
difference for the Y-coordinate but only at the apex (pXapex = 0.90) and for the
Z-coordinate but only at the apex (pXapex = 0.39).
Table 3: Results on the implants in front and back part.

FRONT
Apex Entry point
Global

Combined 0.00 0.00 0.00

X 0.00 0.00

Y 0.11 0.60

Z 0.03 0.13

BACK
Apex Entry point

Global

Combined 0.00 0.00 0.00

X 0.00 0.55

Y 0.90 0.04

Z 0.39 0.00

4. Discussion and Conclusion
In this paper we evaluate the accuracy of the clinical results of dental
implant positioned in total edentulous patients with CAD/CAM surgical
guides produced after 3D software planning, by analysing the discrepancies
between the project position and the clinical position actually reached. Since
data available from this study do not allow to consider traditional parametric
technics we opted for nonparametric technics in the field of permutation
tests.

6 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9