Page 18 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 18

CPS2144 Laura Antonucci et al.
                      The  results  of  the  analysis  highlight  that  there  exist  discrepancies
                  between  the  planned  and  actual  implant  position.  In  general,  from  the
                  analysis it emerges that the X-coordinate (that refers to movements in the
                  internal-external direction of the mouth) is that mainly subjected to errors,
                  both for the apex and the entry point. In particular, it appears that errors are
                  more evident for the implants in the lower part with respect to those in the
                  upper part of the mouth. Furthermore, errors in the implants on the front
                  part refer both to apex and entry point to X-coordinate, whereas for those
                  implants on the back of the mouth refers to the apex X-coordinate and to
                  the nec Y and Z coordinates. We can conclude that the result analysed lead
                  us to think that further development it is necessary to let this method more
                  reliable.

                  References
                  1.  Arboretti, R., Carrozzo, E., Pesarin, F., and Salmaso, L. (2017). A
                      multivariate extension of union–intersection permutation solution for
                      two-sample testing. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practmjnice,
                      11(3):436–448.
                  2.  Arboretti, R., Carrozzo, E., Pesarin, F., and Salmaso, L. (2018). Testing for
                      equivalence: an intersection-union permutation solution. Statistics in
                      Biopharmaceutical Research, 10(2):130–138.
                  3.  Blair, R. C., Higgins, J. J., Karniski, W., and Kromrey, J. D. (1994). A study
                      of multivariate permutation tests which may replace hotelling’s t2 test
                      in prescribed circumstances. Multivariate Behavioral Research,
                      29(2):141–163.
                  4.  Pesarin, F. (2002). Extending permutation conditional inference to
                      unconditional ones. Statistical Methods and Applications, 11(2):161–
                      173.
                  5.  Pesarin, F. and Salmaso, L. (2010). Permutation tests for complex data:
                      theory, applications and software. Wiley.
                  6.  Pesarin, F., Salmaso, L., Carrozzo, E., and Arboretti, R. (2016). Union–
                      intersection permutation solution for two-sample equivalence testing.
                      Statistics and Computing, 26(3):693–701.

















                                                                       7 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23