Page 169 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 169

CPS2227 Jonathan Haughton
            at a different price (the selling price, if they consume their own production) for
            others.
                One approach would be to value autoconsumption using some cluster-
            level median  household- reported price, which should reduce idiosyncratic
            variation in prices, but at the risk of overlooking variations in quality. Another
            possibility would be to collect prices in a separate survey, with the express
            purpose  of  using  them  to  value  household  consumption.  And  a  third
            possibility,  used  in  Rwanda,  is  to  use  prices  collected  by  the  NISR  for
            constructing the consumer price index.
                Using data from 2017, we found that there is no systematic difference
            between the median prices reported by households, and the prices collected
            in the clusters where the households reside, although the household-reported
            prices have a very wide variance.

            3.  Adjusting for prices over time and space
                The household survey data needed to measure poverty are collected in
            different  areas  of  the  country  at  different  times  of  the  year.  There  is
            geographical and temporal variation in prices, and the value of household
            spending needs to be deflated in order to take this variation into account.
                Some, but certainly not all, household surveys collect information on both
            values and quantities of items consumed, and so  one can infer  unit costs,
            which  are  similar  to  prices.  In  principle  these  could  be  used  to  deflate
            household expenditure, although in practice they may not be very accurate,
            given variations in the quality of products. In a few cases, a complementary
            survey collects price data from the areas in which households are surveyed,
            but the quality of these data often suffers, since the enumerators may not be
            skilled at correcting for differences in quality or type. Sometimes the price data
            collected  for  the  consumer  price  index  (CPI)  are  used,  although  in  some
            countries these numbers are only available for urban areas, which makes them
            poor guides to the prices faced by poor, largely rural, households.
                Given  a  set  of  prices,  it  is  possible  to  deflate  consumption  for  each
            household, as done by Kenya (2007) and recommended by Deaton and Zaidi
            (2002). Since these indexes in effect use the consumption weights in the end
            period, they are Paasche indexes, and tend to understate inflation.
                It appears to be more common to create a “poverty price index” that uses
            commodity  weights  that  reflect  the  experience of  households  close  to the
            poverty line – perhaps the poorest (say) 40% of the population (as in Rwanda
            2018), or those whose consumption is expected to be close to the poverty line
            (e.g. Vietnam). More often than not these indexes use the end weights, and so
            are also Paasche indexes, although if there are panel data, more satisfactory
            indexes may be applied (see Haughton and Khandker 2009).



                                                               158 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174