Page 102 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6
P. 102

CPS1835 Lili Chen et al.
                                    G20            Developing country     Developed country
                              (1) FE     (2) RE     (3) FE     (4) RE     (5) FE     (6) RE
                     lnT     0.956***    1.010***    0.921***    0.996***    1.202***    1.263***

                              (25.95)    (26.79)    (14.85)    (16.56)    (41.28)    (45.95)
                    lnAge     0.119*    0.206***    0.184*     0.155     0.136**    0.233***
                              (2.45)     (4.18)     (1.99)     (1.67)     (2.70)     (4.62)
                    lnUrb    0.910***    0.787***    0.724*    0.872**    -0.459**    -0.666***
                              (5.78)     (4.90)     (2.24)     (2.85)     (-3.16)    (-4.88)
                   lnOpen    0.145***    0.080***    0.245***    0.158***    0.083***    0.050***

                              (7.57)     (4.57)     (5.76)     (4.25)     (8.50)     (6.63)
                    _cons        -          -          -         -           -          -
                             15.388***   12.931***   17.822***   12.474***  25.382***   29.902***
                              (-15.53)    (-13.19)    (-8.24)     (-6.64)     (-10.64)    (-12.60)
                      N        500        500        250        251        252        250
                  t statistics in parentheses
                    * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001
                      From  the  regression  estimation  results,  the  primary  and  secondary
                  regression  coefficients  of  GDP  per  capita  are  positive  and  negative
                  respectively, and the EKC curve exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship. The
                  Hausmann test has  a P value of 0.000 and a fixed effect model should be
                  chosen. In the fixed effect model, the impact of the G20 per capita GDP is
                  positive and significant, and the secondary term of GDP per capita is negatively
                  correlated with carbon emissions, which is not significant. Population size and
                  technology have the greatest impact on carbon emissions. They are 1.056 and
                  0.956 respectively. The impact of aging, urbanization and trade openness on
                  carbon emissions are positive and significant. The G20 carbon emissions are in
                  line with the EKC curve inverted U-type assumption. The overall development
                  level of all countries is still on the left side of the inflection point, and has not
                  yet reached the inflection point. The primary and secondary items of GDP per
                  capita  in  developing  countries  are  significant.  The  carbon  emissions  of
                  developing countries are in line with the U-shaped relationship of the EKC
                  curve. The overall development level of all countries is still on the left side of
                  the inflection point and has not yet reached the inflection point. The impacts
                  of population, technology and urbanization on carbon emissions were 1.027,
                  0.921 and 0.787, respectively, and the impact of aging and trade openness on
                  carbon  emissions  was  positive  and  significant.  The  primary  and  secondary
                  items of per capita GDP in developed countries are significant. The carbon
                  emissions of developed countries are in line with the U-shaped curve of the
                  EKC curve. The overall development level of all countries is still on the left side
                  of the inflection point and has not yet reached the inflection point. The impacts


                                                                      91 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107