Page 164 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6
P. 164

CPS1858 Wei Gang et al.
                  technological innovation. This paper selects six most representative indexes in
                  scientific and technological innovation to compare with Shenzhen. The results
                  show that indexes such as R&D personnel, internal R&D expenditures, and
                  patent applications in Qingdao are only about 30% of those in Shenzhen, far
                  lower than about 50% of GDP. The investment intensity of scientific research
                  funds in the whole society is about 60% of that in Shenzhen. Compared with
                  some  key  cities  in  China,  the  R&D  investment  intensity  of  Qingdao  are
                  respectively 2.86%, 0.42%, 0.36% and 0.27% lower than that of Beijing (5.64%),
                  Hangzhou (3.20%), Hefei (3.14%) and Nanjing (3.05%), and 0.65% higher than
                  the national average. So it is necessary to increase the investment intensity.
                      As a whole, Qingdao's digital economy has achieved certain results, but
                  still faces some bottlenecks. Among them, there is not only a problem of weak
                  foundation in digitalization on the demand side, but also insufficient platform
                  support capacity on the supply side, as well as the need for the improvement
                  of environment. Those are mainly manifested in the following: the institutional
                  mechanism needs to be adjusted and improved; the development of digital
                  inclusion needs to be further improved; the support for the industrial Internet
                  platform  is  insufficient;  the  enterprise  innovation  capability  needs  to  be
                  strengthened; the effort of research on new digital industries and formats is
                  insufficient; talents in the digital economy industry are insufficient; the sharing
                  of data information resources is insufficient, etc.

                  4. Discussion and Conclusion
                      In  light  of  the  problems  in  the  development  of  digital  economy  in
                  Qingdao, this paper puts forward opinions and suggestions for accelerating
                  the orderly development of digital economy in Qingdao.
                      (I) Take digital economy as the starting point of promoting the conversion
                  from  traditional  economic  development  momentum  to  new  economic
                  development momentum, as well as optimizing and upgrading industries, and
                  break through the high-quality development with the efficient flow of "total
                  factor" in the market.
                      It is recommended that we should take digital economy as the paramount
                  project in Qingdao, and guide various market factors such as labor, capital,
                  knowledge, technology and management with big data, to form an economic
                  and social ecosystem with orderly and free flow of human resources, logistics,
                  information, capital and even the complete supply chain.
                      (II) Take determining the responsibilities of leading agencies in the digital
                  economy  as  the  key  to  coordinate,  design  and  lead  digital  economy
                  development
                      In  view  of  the  urgent  need  for  the  adjustment  and  improvement  of
                  institutional  mechanism  construction,  upgrade  the  municipal  power  in
                  promoting the coordination leading group for big data development, clarify

                                                                     153 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169