Page 60 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 60

IPS179 Wian B.
                  The range of average transaction values coupled with high heterogeneity in
                  terms of the transaction volume distribution among EFT initiators lead to the
                  conclusion that value or volume weighting schemes would not be appropriate
                  for  purposes  of  monthly  aggregation.  To  therefore  obtain  the  average
                  transaction value per EFT initiator per month, the harmonic mean of the daily
                  average transaction value per EFT initiator falling within a calendar month are
                  calculated (not shown).
                     The focus of the methodological framework will be on the following price
                  indices, both in chain-linked and unchained format: (1) Laspeyres, (2) Paasche,
                  (3)  Fisher,  and  (4)  Törnqvist.  The  Laspeyres  based  salary  EFT  price  index
                  consisting of  EFT initiators can be written as follows (SNA 2008):

                                                               0 0
                                              ∑   (   0  )     ∑    
                                                               
                                                     =1
                                                                            0
                                                          
                                                                            
                                                0
                                 
                                 = ∑ (     0 )  =   ∑      0  ≡  ∑ =1  
                                 
                                               
                                                            0
                                                                       
                                                                           0 0
                                      =1            =1       =1    
                  where   represents average transaction value per EFT initiator per month in
                  the  base  period  while     represents  the  total  number  of  transactions.  To
                                           0
                  remain  consistent  with  the  literature,  the  price  variable  is  displayed  as  
                  instead  of   .  The  variable     represents  the  base  period  proportions.  The
                                               0
                  corresponding Paasche price index can be expressed as:
                                                   −1  −1  ∑    
                                                                       0
                                                                       
                                                        
                                       
                                       = [∑ (    0 )   ]  ≡  ∑  =1  
                                       
                                                        
                                                                      0 0
                                             =1              =1    
                                                                                 
                     The  Fisher  index  is  calculated  as  the  geometric  mean  of   and   ,  or
                                                                                        
                                                                                        
                                                                                 
                    = √  . The Törnqvist index is calculated as the geometric average of
                              
                           
                    
                             
                    
                  the price changes, with a weighting scheme equal to the average value shares
                                                       0
                                                          
                                                     ( + )/2
                                                       
                                                          
                                                   
                                         
                  in the two periods, or  = ∏   ( )      .
                                                    
                                               =1
                                        
                                                    0
                                                   
                                                    
                     A case can be made that the chain-linked versions of the above discussed
                  index formulas would under certain circumstances be more appropriate for
                  purposes  of  developing  a  salary  EFT  index.  Goodridge  (2007)  states,  for
                  instance, that chain-linking allows for more frequent changes to the basket
                  composition,  while  current  period  information  can  be  compared  with  the
                  previous period instead of some arbitrary base period. Chained versions of the
                  Laspeyres, Paasche, Fisher and Törnqvist indices will therefore be tested on
                  the current salary EFT sample.

                     Outlier detection will be done on a quantile basis. The levels associated with
                  minimum wages for domestic workers and an approximate threshold for high
                  income  earners  based  on  the  2017  Tax  Statistics  will  serve  to  guide  the
                                                                      47 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65