Page 79 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 79

IPS184 Sanvi Avouyi-Dovi et al.
                It is worth noting that even though the preliminary tests detected a break
            in the dynamics of the shares during the global financial crisis, the quality of
            the regressions over the period including the early 2010s remains acceptable.
            This  shows  that  the  financial  crisis  did  not  lead  to  a  major  shift  in  French
            households’ portfolio allocation.
                The assessment of the effects of the flat tax, which has replaced the various
            tax regimes of most financial products in France, based on our model, shows
            a substitution out of life insurance contracts and, to a lesser extent, passbooks
            and other monetary assets mostly into equities, with home savings plans being
            unaffected.
                As  an  avenue  for  future  research,  this  study  could  be  extended,  for
            example, by introducing housing and debt into French households’ wealth.

            References
            1.  Amemiya T. 1980. Selection of Regressors, International Economic Review,
                 21 (2), 331-354.
            2.  Amemiya  T.,  1985.  Advanced  Econometrics,  Cambridge:  Harvard
                 University Press.
            3.  Barnett  W.A.,  Seck  O.  2008.  Rotterdam  Model  versus  Almost  Ideal
                 Demand System: Will The Best Specification Please Stand up, Journal of
                 Applied Econometrics, 23, 795-824.
            4.  Blake D. 2004. Modelling the Composition of Personal Sector Wealth in
                 the UK, Applied Financial Economics, 14, 611-630.
            5.  Christensen  L.R.,  Jorgenson  D.W.,  Lau  LJ.  1975.  Transcendental
                 Logarithmic Utility Functions, American Economic Review, 65, 367-383..
            6.  Deaton  A,  Muellbauer  J.  1980a.  An  Almost  Ideal  Demand  System.
                 American Economic Review, 70, 312-326.
            7.  Deaton  A.,  Muellbauer  J.  1980b.  Economics  and  Consumer  Behavior,
                 Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
            8.  Diewert W.E. 1971. An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: a
                 Generalized Leontief Production Function, Journal of Political Economy,
                 79, 461-507.
            9.  Erkan  E.  2006.  Demand  Systems  for  Agricultural  Products  in  OECD
                 Countries, Applied Economics Letters, 13, 163-69.
            10.  Pfister C. 2018. Fiscalité de l’Épargne et Choix de Portefeuille des Ménages
                 Français, Revue d’économie financière, 131, 61-75.
            11.  Theil  H.  1965.  The  Information  Approach  to  Demand  Analysis,
                 Econometrica, 33, 67-87.
            12.  Theil H. 1975a. Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand, Vol. 1.
                 North-Holland: Amsterdam.
            13.  Theil H. 1975b. Theory and Measurement of Consumer Demand, Vol. 2.
                 North-Holland: Amsterdam.

                                                                66 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84