Page 96 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2

IPS184 Ivette F. et al.
However, it is worth remembering that this information also exhibits some
limitations in its use, due primarily to the fact that its publication does not
cover all the financial instruments. In addition, to achieve an in-depth analysis
it would be necessary to supplement the published data for these aggregated
classifications of instruments and sectors with additional information; for
example, through the complementary use of data from Household surveys
which could facilitate an intra-sector analysis.
In conclusion, it will be necessary in the future to continue developing
these matrices through the rest of the financial instruments, which will enable
to represent the dynamics of savings and investment, investment and
financing flows, and changes in investment portfolios between different
sectors.

References
1. Central Bank of Chile (2011). "National Accounts by Institutional Sectors,
NA-IS, methodology and results 2005-2011 q1 (only in Spanish)”.
Statistical Economic Studies, No. 87. Santiago, Chile.
2. Central Bank of Chile (2017ª). “Adoption of the SNA 2008 in the National
Accounts by Institutional Sector (only in Spanish)”. Methodological Note.
Santiago, Chile.
3. Central Bank of Chile (2017b). “Benchmark Compilation 2013”. Santiago,
Chile.
4. Fernández, I. (2013). “Sectoral Interlinkages in Chile: An Implementation
of National Accounts by Institutional Sector”. Statistical Economic
Studies, No. 97. Santiago, Chile.
5. Henríquez, C. – Pérez, J. (2016). “La Economía Chilena en el período
2003- 2014: Un Análisis desde la Perspectiva de las Cuentas Nacionales
por Sector Institucional (only in Spanish)”. Statistical Economic Studies,
No. 117. Santiago, Chile.

83 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9