Page 230 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 2
P. 230
STS486 Alessandro F. et al.
() be the set of time steps corresponding to the − ℎ period. If Δ is
constant, than () = Δ( − 1) + 1: Δ].
Now, the maximum likelihood estimate for − ℎ period is given by
̂
̂
= () = arg maxlog ( () )
and the fitted values for (), () are obtained by
(~)
0
( |) = () ( ()| −;+ ).
(~)
In the last equation, −;+ are the data in a neighborhood of , excluded.
If +1 ≠ , we may have an artificial discontinuity of ̂ around the
border of the − ℎ and ( + 1) − ℎ periods. For change detection, this
discontinuity is not a concern as long as it does not propagate to the residuals.
In any case, this issue may be substantially mitigated using a smooth update
̂
of .
In particular, an approach similar to the recursive estimation of dynamical
models of Grillenzoni (1994 and 1997) considers a single step of a Newton-
Raphson algorithm at each Δ-period:
̂
′
′′ −1
= ̂ −1 + ( ) (4)
where ′ and ′′ are Jacobian and Hessian of log ( () ).
5. Fused LASSO change detection
Let us denote the change model for a fixed station and altitude ℎ, by
0
= +
where is the zero mean GP of Equation (2) and defines isolated,
0
temporary or permanent changes as discussed in Section 1. Formally, is a
deterministic, piece-wise constant function with change points at an unknown
number ≥ 0, of unknown change points , … , ∈ {1, … , }.
∗
∗
1
Once the fitted values of the previous section are available for the station
at , the following (sign changed) residuals are computed:
= ( , , ℎ) = ( , , ℎ) − ̂ ( , , ℎ)
for = 1, … , , ℎ ∈ [ℎ , … , ℎ ] . Now, conditionally on the GP parameter
1
estimates of the previous section, we have that
( ) = .
We than test for changes the station in using the fused LASSO approach,
Tibshirani et al. (2005). In particular, we assume that
= +
where ≡ (0, ).
2
The model (5) has parameters , plus = ( ). Hence, we regularise
2
the estimation using the following penalised criterion:
2
∑( − ) + ∑| | + ∑| − −1 |
1
2
=1 =1 =2
219 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9