Page 207 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 207

STS540 Zhi Lin C. et al.
            4.2 Performance comparison between the GR and SSGR schemes (OC )
                In this subsection, we compare the performance of the OC  (1)
            between the GR and SSGR schemes, i.e. case >0 in Tables 2 to 4. From Tables
            2 to 4, we notice that when  < 2.0, the SSGR scheme has consistently lower
            1 compared to the GR scheme except for two cases, i.e. (,  opt, 0) =
            (7, 1.0, 370) and (7, 1.0, 500) when  = 1.0; whereas when  > 2.0, the SSGR
            scheme has either slightly lower or almost the same 1 compared to the
            GR  scheme.  Therefore,  we  conclude  that  the  SSGR  scheme  has  a  superior
            1  performance  compared  to  GR  scheme.  The  1  result,
            complemented with the 1 result in Yew et al. (2016), showed that the SSGR
            scheme prevails over the GR scheme in terms of 1 and 1.

            5.  Conclusions
                In  this  paper,  we  perform  an  in-depth  SDTS  performance  comparison
            between  the  GR  and  SSGR  schemes.  We  utilize  the  ScicosLab  software  to
            compute the optimal parameters of the GR and SSGR schemes by minimizing
            the ATS1. Then, we use the SAS software to calculate the SDTS of the GR and
            SSGR  schemes  for  various  mean  shift  sizes  .  From  the  performance
            comparison, we
            conclude that the GR scheme slightly surpasses the SSGR scheme in terms of
            SDTS0 performance. However, the opposite is true for the SDTS1, where the
            SSGR  scheme  outperforms  the  GR  scheme.  This  indicates  that  although
            practitioners  are  encouraged  to  use  the  SSGR  scheme  due  to  its  superior
            SDTS1 performance, they should not ignore the fact that the performance of
            the SSGR scheme is slightly inferior to the GR scheme in terms of SDTS0 and it
            may lead to a higher early false alarm than the GR scheme. Future research
            can compare the performance of the GR and SSGR schemes in terms of SDTS
            by minimizing the OC median time to signal (MTS1) instead of the ATS1, since
            the median is less affected by outliers compared to the average.

            References
            1.  Antzoulakos, D.L. & Rakitzis, A.C. (2008). The revised m-of-k runs rule.
                Qual. Eng., 20, 75–81. Chong, Z.L., Khoo, M.B.C., Lee, M.H. & Chen, C.H.
                (2017). Group runs revised m-of-k runs rule control chart. Commun. Stat.
                Theory Methods, 46, 6916–6935.
            2.  Chong, Z.L., Khoo, M.B.C., Teoh, W.L., Yeong, W.C. & Lim, S.L. (2019).
                Optimal design of the modified group runs (MGR) X chart when process
                parameters are estimated. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., to be
                published.
            3.  Gadre, M.P. & Rattihalli, R.N. (2004). A group runs control chart for
                detecting shifts in the process mean. Econ. Qual. Contr., 19, 29−43.



                                                               196 |I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212