Page 21 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 4
P. 21

STS556 Nitin Kumar et al.
            (1991) and Arellano and Bover (1995) has been employed to estimate casual
            effect of regressor on dependent variable, formulated as follows.



                 The lagged endogenous variable is represented by yi, t-1 with Xi, t being
             matrix of other exogenous variables as explained in previous section.

            3.  Result
                As per summary results, at gross level average accounts receivables are
            observed  to  be  18  per  cent  that  is  higher  compared  to  average  accounts
            payables at 14 per cent for Indian firms during the study period. It signifies
            that at gross level the firms in sample have applied financial strategy to sell
            their goods. Temporal behavior of accounts payables and account receivables
            shows  that  Indian  firms  have  been  net  accounts  receiver  throughout  the
            period (Chart 1). It is observed that there has been slight dip in trade credit
            post financial crisis with AP falling from 14.0 per cent in 2008 to 13.3 per cent
            in 2009. Similarly, AR registered decline from 18.3 per cent in 2008 to 17.2 per
            cent in 2009.





















                The  dynamic  panel  regression  model  applying  GMM  estimator  with
            accounts  payables  as  dependent  variable  is  reported  in  Table  1.  Separate
            regressions were performed for all firms, major sectors viz., manufacturing,
            services.  Within  manufacturing  separate  regression  are  performed  for
            chemical product firms, textiles to detect possible variations, if any. Finally,
            separate  regression  has  been  done  for  small  and  large  firms  also.  Firms
            existing in the top/bottom 25 percentile as per total assets are chosen for
            small/large  classification.  Most  of  estimates  are  significant  signifying
            satisfactory fit.





                                                                10 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26