Page 26 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 4
P. 26

STS556 Nitin Kumar et al.

                   L1.GR_RATE   -0.001     -2.9E-04    -0.002*    -0.002**   -0.001**   -0.002***

                                (0.001)    (8.6E-04)   (0.001)    (7.6E-04)   (5.1E-04)   (4.3E-04)
                   Wald         173***     149***      213***      352***   2212***   2009***

                   Statistics
                      Separate regressions have been repeated to evaluate if the trade credit
                  ratios depict significant variation for constrained vis-à-vis unconstrained firms
                  (Table 3). It is found that for unconstrained firms higher bank borrowings is
                  leading  to  higher  accounts  payables.  For  accounts  receivables  higher
                  borrowings  translates  to  higher  accounts  receivables  for  constrained  firms
                  whereas the relationship is inverse for unconstrained firms. Last but not least,
                  we  analyze  the  impact  of  firms'  financial  distress  on  trade  credit  behavior
                  broadly. In this regard, foremost, firms are classified into two groups viz., non-
                  distress or distress using the criteria adopted by Shriavstava. et. al. (2008). The
                  predicted probability values so obtained using logit regression included as an
                  additional explanatory variable in model to assess its impact on trade credit
                  operations. The regression results exhibiting the impact of distress indicator
                  reveals a significant positive effect of financial distress on accounts payables
                  (Table 3). The finding indicates that higher possibility of bankruptcy may lead
                  a firm to greater risk taking by increasing its trade payables liability. However,
                  as  regards  accounts  receivable,  although  the  relationship  is  negative,  it  is
                  insignificant  implying  inconclusive  effect  of  distress  in  case  of  accounts
                  receivable.

                  4.  Discussion and Conclusion
                      Trade credit has been a convenient source of financing especially for firms
                  constrained  by  formal  sources  of  borrowing.  Applying  dynamic  panel
                  generalized method of moment methodology it is found that pecking order
                  theory  is  strongly  validated  with  net  earnings  being  preferred  source  of
                  financing  compared  to  trade  credit  that  is  a  more  expensive  source  of
                  financing. Bank borrowing is complementing trade credit receivables for the
                  sample of firms. Macro indicators like growth rate, inflation and interest rate
                  are significant for trade credit decisions. It is found that for unconstrained
                  firms  higher  bank  borrowings  is  leading  to  higher  accounts  payables.  For
                  accounts  receivables  higher  borrowings  translates  to  higher  accounts
                  receivables  for  constrained  firms  whereas  the  relationship  is  inverse  for
                  unconstrained firms. The finding further indicates that higher possibility of
                  bankruptcy  may  lead  a  firm  to  greater  risk  taking  by  increasing  its  trade
                  payables  liability.  However,  as  regards  accounts  receivable,  although  the
                  relationship  is  negative,  it  is  insignificant  implying  inconclusive  effect  of
                  distress in case of accounts receivable.




                                                                      15 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31