Page 245 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2
P. 245

CPS1846 Maryam I. et al.
            to 1200 km of the prediction location (Hansen et al., 2010). The weight of each
            sample point decreases linearly from unity to zero. This interpolation scheme
            computes estimates by weighting the sample points closer to the prediction
            location greater than those farther away without considering the degree of
            autocorrelation for those distances. On the other hand, the JMA (Ishii et al.,
            2005)  records  use  covariance  structure  of  spatial  data  and  are  based  on
            traditional kriging. Formal Gaussian process regression is used by the BEST to
            produce spatially complete temperature estimates (Rhode et al., 2013). It is
            worth noting that these interpolation approaches do not consider the multi-
            scale  feature  of  geophysical  processes.  Additionally,  regional  coverage
            uncertainty estimates are not available for these data sets. Recently, a new
            monthly temperature data set (Ilyas et al., 2017) is created. It results from the
            application  of  the  multi-resolution  lattice  kriging  approach  (Nychka  et  al.,
            2015)  that captures variation at multiple scales of the spatial process. This
            multi-resolution  model  quantifies  gridded  uncertainties  in  global
            temperatures due to the gaps in spatial coverage. It results in a 10,000 member
            ensemble of monthly temperatures over the entire globe. These are spatially
            dense equally plausible fields that sample the combination of observational
            and coverage uncertainties. The data are open access and freely available at:
            https://oasishub.co/dataset/global-monthly-temperature-ensemble-1850-
            to-2016. This paper provides an update on Ilyas et al. (2017) data set. Here, a
            new  version  of  this  data  is  produced  that  incorporates  the  parametric
            uncertainties in addition to the observational and coverage errors. To account
            for the model parametric uncertainties, an  approximate Bayesian  inference
            methodology is proposed for multi-resolution lattice kriging (Nychka et al.,
            2015). It is based on variogram that is a measure of spatial variability between
            spatial observations as a function of spatial distance.

            2.  Methodology

            2.1 Multi-resolution lattice kriging using ABC
                 Multi-resolution lattice kriging (MRLK) has been introduced by Nychka et
            al. (2015). It is a linear approach that models spatial observations in terms of
            a  Gaussian  process,  linear  trend  and  measurement  error  term.  This
            methodology extends spatial methods to very large data sets accounting for
            all  scales.  It  is  a  methodology  for  spatial  inference  and  prediction.  This
            approach has the advantage of being computationally feasible for large data
            sets  by  the  virtue  of  sparse  covariance  matrices.  The  MRLK  models  the
            underlying spatial process as the sum of independent processes each of which
            is the linear combination of the basis functions. The basis functions are fixed
            and co-efficients of the basis functions are random. Consider observations 
            at  spatial  locations  ,  , … . ,   in  the  spatial  domain  .  The  aim  is  to
                                             
                                      2
                                   1
                                                               234 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250