Page 300 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2
P. 300

CPS1863 La Gubu et al.
                  portfolio Sharpe ratio with FMCD estimation is 0.2248905 and the classic MV
                  portfolio  ratio  Sharpe  is  0.1464506.  So  for  risk  aversion    =  0.5,  the
                  performance of the MV portfolio with robust FMCD estimation is better than
                  the classic MV portfolio. If we look further, it turns out that for all risk aversion
                  values  γ,  FMCD's  estimated  portfolio  return  is  higher  than  the  classic  MV
                  portfolio return. Unlike risk, for all values of , the classic MV portfolio risk is
                  better than FMCD's portfolio. However, the Sharpe ratio of FMCD's portfolio
                  ratio is higher than the classic MV portfolio for all values  . Therefore, we can
                  concluded  that  the  performance  of  the  MV  portfolio  with  robust  FMCD
                  estimation was better than the classic MV portfolio.


                  4.2 Conclusions
                      This  paper  shows  how  to  integrate clustering  techniques  into  portfolio
                  management and building systems to get an efficient portfolio. The clustering
                  process can reduce very significantly the time required to select the best stocks
                  for the portfolio because stocks from similar categories can be easily grouped
                  into one cluster. The best performing stocks from each cluster are then chosen
                  as representations of the cluster to build the portfolio. The results showed that
                  45  stocks  included  in  the  LQ-45  group  was  into  7  clusters.  Stock  as  a
                  representation of each cluster then used to form a portfolio using the MV
                  model with FMCD estimation. The portfolio performance formed by using the
                  MV portfolio model with robust FMCD estimation is then compared with the
                  portfolio  performance  formed  using  the  classic  MV  portfolio  model.  The
                  results showed that the performance of the MV portfolio with robust FMCD
                  estimation was better than the classic MV portfolio for all risk aversion values
                  γ.
                      For future research, it will be interesting to use other robust estimates and
                  compare portfolio performance that builds up using these estimates.


                  Acknowledgments
                      I thank to Indonesia Endownment Fun for Education (Lembaga Pengelola
                  Dana Pendidikan, LPDP) Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia for
                  the  scholarship  funds  given  for  my  Doctoral  program  at  the  Mathematics
                  Department of Gadjah Mada University.

                  References
                  1.  Chen, L.H., and Huang, L. (2009). Portfolio optimization of equity mutual
                      funds with fuzzy return rates and risks, Expert Systems with Applications,
                      36, 3720-3727.




                                                                     289 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305