Page 367 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2
P. 367

CPS1888 Chen C. et al.
            2.1 Data assessment
                Various  aspects  of  GST  data  are  examined  within  this  model,  such  as
            reporting  structures,  timeliness,  conceptual  alignment,  and  reporting
            frequency. These are shown as decision boxes in Figure 2.
                Conceptual alignment - Administrative data has  not been collected for
            statistical purposes, therefore its alignment to the conceptual and definitional
            requirements of our outputs needs to be assessed. We take the annualised
            GST values and compare it with our annual financial data and found that in
            most case the GST data can be used in the production of quarterly outputs.
            We also developed a GST outlier strategy to effectively remove sales of large
            capital items, which may have material impact on levels and movements in
            some industries.
                Timelines –To use administrative data in our quarterly outputs we must
            have timely data. A significant finding in our assessment is the fact that at least
            85 to 95 percent of GST data by value is available within current quarterly
            production timeframes. Wherever the GST data is unavailable, we developed
            a GST imputation strategy to obtain fit-for-purpose data.
                Reporting structures - Administrative data is usually collected from legal
            units and this is also the case with GST. Legal units that are most likely to be
            statistically fit for use are those that correspond to statistical units with activity
            predominately  in  a  single  industry.  As  the  unit  structures  become  more
            complex, e.g. legal units linked by ownership to provide (referred to as GST
            groups), the use of GST data becomes more problematic. With the assessment
            model, we found that over 95% businesses by count have a simple reporting
            structure and the GST data can be used directly.
                Reporting frequency – Businesses in New Zealand can file GST data on a
            monthly, two-monthly (referred to as TA if file in odd months and as TB if file
            in  even  months)  and  six-monthly  basis  depending  on  turnover  size.  For
            quarterly outputs, a monthly reporting frequency is ideal as data can be easily
            added up to a quarterly value. Businesses with a reporting frequency of more
            than a month require some form of transformation to enable the publication
            of quarterly data.

            2.2 Transformation methodology
                Depending  on  the  data  assessment  and  its  fitness  for  use,  the  most
            appropriate transformation methodology is established for the various ‘parts’
            of the business population.
                Direct unmodified approach - The direct unmodified approach uses the
            GST data as it is received (with imputation and capital adjustment in place).
            This is applied to GST monthly filers with a simple structure, and small GST
            monthly groups where the reporting unit or a single legal unit within the group
            accounted for greater than 80 percent of the group value. The sales measures

                                                               356 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372