Page 85 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2
P. 85

CPS1437 Thanyani M.
                It was clearly stated that calibration aims at improving estimated of sample
            surveys.  Furthermore  calibration  should  bring  sample  weight  distribution
            closer to the distribution of auxiliary totals. While the methods of  relaxing
            constraints to achieve such objective there is eminent danger of distorting
            sampling  distribution,  therefore  quality  of  auxiliary  variables  is  of  utmost
            importance.

            References
            1.  Bar-Gera, H., Konduri, K. C., Sana, B., Ye, X., and Pendyala, R. M., (2009).
                 Estimating survey weights with multiple constraints using entropy
                 optimization methods. Technical report.
            2.  Davies, G., (2018). Examination of approaches to calibration in survey
                 sampling. (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University).
            3.  Deville, J.C. and Särndal, C.E., (1992). Calibration estimators in survey
                 sampling. Journal of the American statistical Association, 87(418),
                 pp.376-382.
            4.  Deville, J.C. and Särndal, C.E., and Sautory, O., (1993). Generalized raking
                 procedures in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical
                 Association, 88 (423), 1013–1020.
            5.  Fuller, W.A. (2002). Regression Estimation for Survey Samples. Survey
                 Methodology, Vol. 28, pp. 5-23.
            6.  Gambino, J., Kennedy, B. and Singh, M.P. (2001). Regression Composite
                 Estimation for the Canadian Labour Force Survey. Survey Methodology,
                 Vol. 27, pp. 65-74.
            7.  Mohadjer, L., Montaquila, J. M., Waksberg, J., Bell, B., James, P., Flores-
                 Cervantes, I., and Montes, M., (1996). National Health and Nutrition
                 Examination Survey III: Weighting and estimation methodology.
                 Rockville, MD: Westat.
            8.  Reid, A. and Hall, D. W., (2001). Using equalisation constraints to find
                 optimal calibration weights. U.S. Bureau of the Census.
            9.  Wallace, L. and Rust, K., (1996). A Comparison of raking and
                 poststratification using 1994 NAEP Data. Westat. Rockville.
            10.  Wu, S., Kennedy, B., AND Singh, A. C., (1997). Household-level versus
                 person-level regression weight calibration for household survey. SSC
                 Annual Meeting, June 1997.














                                                                74 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90