Page 24 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 3
P. 24

CPS1931 Arman B. et al.
                  health  policies  against  core  concepts  of  human  rights  and  identifying
                  vulnerable groups that, in principle, must be targeted by public health policies
                  (Amin M et al, 2011).
                      The core concepts are a unique feature of the tool as they allow each issue
                  for action and Target Group to be assessed for its potential to address the
                  social, economic, environmental and institutional pillars of development, as
                  appropriate and relevant. In effect, each issue for action and Target Group
                  could link to more than one core concept. In the real world, it is a known fact
                  that often sectoral policies are applied in isolation. Also, adequate linkages are
                  often not established between SDG targets. This stove-pipe approach to policy
                  formulation  and  implementation  often  leads  to  inadequate  understanding
                  and  appreciation  of  the  multiple  and  simultaneous  disadvantages  and
                  vulnerability faced by population/Target Groups. Thus, policies often do not
                  reach the most marginalized groups, which in turn also results in fragmented
                  data  collection  without  looking  at  simultaneous  or  nested  disaggregation
                  characteristics. Thus, the core concepts could serve as an aid to bring about
                  better integration of Issues for Action and Target Groups across the various
                  pillars of development, to address the principle of “leave-no-one-behind” in
                  the policy-making and data collection processes.
                      In  addition  to  establishing  linkages  across  the  social,  economic,
                  environment and institutional dimensions of development, the core concepts
                  also broaden perspectives and provide insight on Issues for Action and Target
                  Groups, which could potentially have been relevant for coverage in the policy
                  document,  but  were  missed  out.  For  instance,  while  enhancing  women’s
                  labour force participation could primarily be an issue for action addressing the
                  economic  pillar  of  development  (as  it  could  concern  the  issue  of  creating
                  decent work for women; their protection for working across borders etc.), the
                  policy  may  fail  to  realize  that  unless  women’s  unpaid  work  burden  is  not
                  reduced or redistributed at the intra-household level (social dimension), their
                  physical working environment is not improved in certain occupations or work
                  places (environmental dimension), or the legal infrastructure in the country is
                  not conducive (institutional dimension), related policies may not reach those
                  facing multiple forms of deprivation. Thus, the core concepts provide insight
                  on what may be potentially important and relevant in the national context, but
                  has been missed out of the policy. They provide useful inputs and guidance
                  for policy review or reformulation in the future.

                  National sustainable development indicator set
                      Assessing each issue for action and Target Group from the angle of the
                  various  pillars  for  development  allows  for  the  development  of  a  more
                  comprehensive  supporting  indicator  framework,  as  the  indicators  required
                  measuring  these  various  dimensions  (economic,  social,  environment,

                                                                      13 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29