Page 177 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 177

CPS2166 Divo Dharma Silalahi et al.


































                   Figure 1. Comparison of the selected relevant variables on sine function data
                The most relevant variables selected by the methods in the model were
            determined based on their cut-off threshold criterion using the score values.
            This  was  calculated  and  afterwards  plotted  in  Figure  1  to  evaluate  the
            interpretability of the results. As seen in Figure  1, there were 8 variables (
             x  , x   , x   , x   , x   ,x  ,x   ,x ) with the classical VIP score greater than 1 and
              1  5  7   15  22  28  29  36
            considered as the most relevant variables. Comparing with the VIP-total score
            (denotes as OPLS-VIP), the VIP score vectors both classical VIP and VIP-total
            provided  similar  profiles.  But  in  the  VIP-total  suggested  more  number  of
            relevant variables (14 variables) than the classical VIP. Using the MCUVE and
            mod-VIP-MCUVE  input  scaling  method,  there  were  6  variables  (
             x 1 , x   5 , x   7 , x   15 , x   22 ,x ) with score values greater than cut-off threshold criterion.

                              35
            Both  classical  VIP  and  VIP-total  score  produced  over-selection  variables
            compared to the MCUVE and mod-VIP-MCUVE. The contribution level of the
            selected relevant variables provided in the MCUVE and mod-VIP-MCUVE input
            scaling  model  were also  closely  comparable  to  the  original  formulation  as
            stated in (8). It is clear to claim if using the proposed method in this study, the
            final  subset  of  selected  relevant  variables  guarantees  the  best  prediction
            capabilities both in the training and testing dataset.
            a.  Experimental NIRS Dataset
                 The  NIRS  spectral  data  was  obtained  by  scanning  the  fresh  and  dried
            ground fruit mesocarp, right after spectra collection the samples were sent to
            the laboratory for wet chemistry analysis. The percentage of Oil to Dry Mesocarp

                                                               166 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182