Page 259 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 259

CPS2219 Hasih P. et al.
            that the intensity of earthquakes for both regions is more dominated by the
            influence  of  pressure  in  the  region  itself  than  other  regions.  Plot  of  the
            conditional intensity function of a linked stress release model on earthquake
            data in Java and BaliNusa Tenggara is shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that
            the  intensity  of  earthquakes  in  Java  is  relatively  higher  than  in  Bali-Nusa
            Tenggara.
               Figure 2: Intensity function conditional of linked stress release model on
                       earthquake data in Java (a) and Bali-Nusa Tenggara (b).

            4.   Conclusion
                Conditional  intensity  function  of  the  linked  stress  release  model  is  the
            development  of  the  intensity  function  of  the  stress  release  model  by
            considering inter-regional interactions. Conditional intensity function of the
            model  can  be  presented  by  hazard  function  of  stress  movement  and
            interaction  among  areas.  Based  on  earthquake  data  in  Java  and  Bali-Nusa
            Tenggara, there is influence of stress transfer to earthquake intensity in the
            region which is dominated by the proportion of pressure from the region itself.
            Intensity of the earthquake in Java is relatively higher than the one in Bali-
            Nusa Tenggara.

            References
            1.  C. Lu, D. Harte, and M. Bebbington, “A Linked Stress Release Model for
                 Historical Japanese Earthquake: Coupling among Major Seismic Regions”,
                 Earth Planets Space, no. 51, pp. 907-916, 1999.
            2.  D.  Vere-Jones,  “Earthquake  Prediction  –  A  Statistician’s  View”,  J.  Phys
                 Earth. Vol. 26, pp. 129- 146, 1978.
            3.  H.  Kanamori  and  D.  L.  Anderson,  “Amplitude  of  the  Earth’s  Free
                 Oscillations  and  Long-Period  Characteristic  of  the  Earthquake  Source”,
                 Geophys, no. 80, pp. 1075-1078, 1975.
            4.  N. Sunusi, A. K. Jaya, A. Islamiyati, and Raupone, “Studi Temporal Point
                 Process  pada  Analisa  Prakiraan  Peluang  Waktu  Kemunculan  Gempa,
                 Mitigasi  dan  Manajemen  Sumber  Daya  Alam”,  Research  report,
                 Mathematics  Department,  FMIPA,  Universitas  Hasanuddin,  Makassar,
                 2013.
            5.  X.  Zheng  and.  Vere-Jones,  “Applications  of  Stress  Release  Models  to
                 Historical Earthquake from North China”, Pure Appl. Geophys, vol. 4, no.
                 135, pp. 559-576, 1991.
            6.  Y. Ogata, “Seismicity Analysis Trough Point Process Modelling: A Review”,
                 Pure an Applied Geophysics, no. 155, pp. 471-507, 1999.




                                                               248 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264