Page 42 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 42

CPS2111 Grant J. Cameron et al.
                      In  this  paper,  we  aim  at  laying  out  the  conceptual  foundation  behind
                  statistical capacity indexes, and construct a new index based on practical and
                  theoretical considerations. We review existing measurement methodologies,
                  posit  desired  attributes,  and  propose  updated  indicators,  and  an  updated
                  Statistical Capacity Index (hereafter referred to as the Statistical Performance
                  Index, or SPI). On the empirical front, we expand the number of indicators in
                  the old SCI by almost twice, and we extend the sample of covered countries
                  by one-half to all countries in the world.

                  2. Methodology
                      In order to construct a measure that is policy relevant it is helpful to follow
                  a series of basic steps.
                                        6
                      The first step asks the question: what phenomenon is being measured? A
                  clear conception helps orient the process by which the measure is assembled
                  and will prove valuable in communicating its underlying meaning.
                      The second step asks: for what purpose or purposes is the index being
                  sought? Knowing how the index will be used can greatly affect subsequent
                  choices in its construction, and its eventual suitability. In particular, it will help
                  define the unit of analysis both for data gathering and reporting purposes.
                      The third step identifies a list of essential characteristics, or desiderata,
                  that the methodology should exhibit. This list of “pre-axioms” helps orient the
                  construction process and define what success means.
                      A fourth step identifies the conceptual space in which measurement is to
                  take place. If there are multiple conceptual dimensions, consideration must
                  also be given to the relative importance of each.
                      The  fifth  step  selects  the  form  of  the  variables  to  be  used  and  the
                  aggregation method to be employed – how the variables are to be combined
                  into an overall measure.
                      The sixth step identifies a set of axioms that the resulting index should
                  satisfy  to  have  the  greatest  practical  utility.  Axioms  are  not  sterile
                  mathematical requirements, but rather contain the salient nuggets of policy
                  required of the index: which aspects of the data should be ignored, which
                  should  be  reflected,  and  helpful  consistency  requirements  over  subsets  of
                  data. Together, these six steps comprise the core theoretical elements of our
                  proposed measurement technology.
                      We briefly summarize the main ideas of the sixth step in our proposed
                  methodology below. Interested readers are referred to the full version of the
                  paper for more discussion and further technical details on the other steps; the
                  equation and section numbers below refer to those in the full paper version.


                  6  This process is similar for many types of measurement exercises. See for example Alkire et al. (2015) in
                  the context of multidimensional poverty measurement.
                                                                      31 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47