Page 185 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7
P. 185

CPS2056 Nurul Hafizah Azizan et al.
               6.  Daher, A. M., Ahmad, S. H., Winn, T., & Selamat, M. I. (2015). Impact of
                   rating scale categories on reliability and fit statistics of the Malay Spiritual
                   well-being Scale using Rasch analysis. Malaysian Journal of Medical
                   Sciences, 22(3), 48–55.
               7.  Eutsler, J., & Lang, B. (2015). Rating Scales in Accounting Research: The
                   Impact of Scale Points and Labels. Behavioral Research in Accounting,
                   27(2), 35–51.
               8.  Gaskell, G., Wright, D. B., & O’Muircheartaigh, C. (1995). Weighing
                   anchors: Verbal and numeric labels for response scales. Journal of Official
                   Statistics.
               9.  Hasson, D., & Arnetz, B. B. (2005). Validation and findings comparing VAS
                   vs. Likert scales for psychosocial measurements. International Electronic
                   Journal of Health Education, 8, 178–192.
               10. Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muniz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of
                   response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales.
                   European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social
                   Sciences, 4(2), 73.
               11. Maydeu-Olivares, A., Kramp, U., Garcia-Forero, C., Gallardo-Pujol, D., &
                   Coffman, D. (2009). The effect of varying the number of response
                   alternatives in rating scales: Experimental evidence from intra-individual
                   effects. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 41(2), 295–308.
               12. Osteras, N., Gulbrandsen, P., Garratt, A., Benth, J. S., Dahl, F. A., Natvig, B.,
                   & Brage, S. (2008). A randomised comparison of a four- and a five-point
                   scale version of the Norwegian Function Assessment Scale. Health and
                   Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 1–9.
               13. Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response
                   categories in rating scales:
               14. reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.
                   Journal of Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15.
               15. Radhakrishna, R. B. (2007). Tips for developing and testing
                   questionnaires/instruments. Journal of Extension, 45(1), 1–4.
               16. Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the Number
                   of Categories in AgreeDisagree Scales. Sociological Methods and
                   Research, 43(1), 73–97.
               17. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill
                   building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
               18. Shultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2013). Measurement theory in
                   action: Case studies and exercises. Routledge.
               19. Weng, L. J. (2004). Impact of the number of response categories and
                   anchor labels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability. Educational
                   and Psychological Measurement, 64(6), 956–972.



                                                                  172 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190