Page 74 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 7
P. 74

CPS2031 Javier Linkolk L. et al.
                      Finally, according to Figure 5,6 and 7, the LSTM are presented, where each
                  square represents a neuron, that is, each neuron reflects an LSTM. This shows
                  that there are 25 LSTMs that generate the 365 time series.
                      In parallel, in figure 8, the root of the mean quadratic error (RMSE) of each
                  neuron is observed along with its Train Score (TSN), reporting the lowest RMSE

                  in the neuron (1,3).

                  4.  Discussion and Conclusion
                      Under the LSTM model, the estimation and adjustment report of the "La
                  Florida" station had important results close to the real data. In the same way
                  that [19] in this research it is shown that the LSTM has a good capacity of
                  adaptation to estimate the concentration of PM2.5, even more when it merges
                  with the SOM at the time of grouping.
                      The assembly between SOM and LSTM, allowed grouping the time series
                  according to the determined pattern. This showed neurons that have a group
                  of similar time series that corresponds to the pollution record per hour in a
                  day.
                      For each neuron an LSTM network was adjusted, able to model its data
                  well; thus, one LSTM is trained per neuron, but each LSTM learns several time
                  series.
                      As future work, different assembled algorithms will be competed, both for
                  estimation and clustering, with the assembly proposal that was made.

                  References
                  1.  Liang, B., Li, X. L., Ma, K., and Liang, S. X, “Pollution characteristics of
                      metal pollutants in PM2. 5 and comparison of risk on human health in
                      heating and non-heating seasons in Baoding, China”, Ecotoxicology and
                      environmental safety, vol. 170, pp. 166-171, 2019.
                  2.  Xing, Y. F., Xu, Y. H., Shi, M. H., and Lian, Y. X, “The impact of PM2. 5 on
                      the human respiratory system”, Journal of thoracic disease, vol. 8, no 1,
                      p. E69, 2016.
                  3.  Wang, C., Tu, Y., Yu, Z., & Lu, R, “PM2. 5 and cardiovascular diseases in
                      the elderly: An overview”, International journal of environmental
                      research and public health, vol. 12, no 7, p. 8187¬8197, 2015.
                  4.  Zhang, Q., Jiang, X., Tong, D., Davis, S. J., Zhao, H., Geng, G., and Ni, R,
                      “Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and
                      international trade”, Nature, vol. 543, no 7647, p. 705, 2017.
                  5.  Atkinson, R. W., Kang, S., Anderson, H. R., Mills, I. C., and Walton, H. A.,
                      “Epidemiological time series studies of PM2. 5 and daily mortality and
                      hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis”, Thorax,
                      2014, p. thoraxjnl-2013-204492, 2014.



                                                                      61 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79