Page 215 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 8
P. 215

CPS2254 Dan C.
            trials, we see a minimum of three and a maximum of eight empty squares. So,
            what would be typical for the number of empty squares? If zero empty squares
            was considered very unlikely (corresponding to one raindrop per square), then
            wouldn’t one or two empty squares be fairly likely?

                In fact, students realized that Figure 3 was of poor use in ascertaining what
            was typical, since nothing too definitive emerges regarding the center of that
            distribution. After examining repeated batches of thirty trials, students wanted
            to aggregate the batches and we ended up doing 100 or more trials per batch.
            The time it would take Fathom to generate such results varied according to
            the relevant computer power, but usually something like 1000 trials only took
            about one minute or less. Figure 4 (below) shows the same idea of Figure 3
            but a much stronger sense of distribution emerges.

                                Many Trials of 16 Raindrops













                         Figure 4: Counting the empty squares in each of 1000 trials

                When shown some “real or fake?” data, for instance, students moved away
            from their claims such as “Who can tell for sure?” or “You never know, that
            [result]  might  have  happened”.  Such  claims  show  an  over-appreciation  of
            variability,  especially  when  looking  at  the  tails  of  distributions  like  that  in
            Figure 4. Instead, as students reasoned about what was likely, they showed
            more sophistication in reconciling expected values with the variability they had
            witnessed in analysing many results.
                 Especially encouraging was the way students developed new questions to
            help decide on what real or fake data might be, such as “How likely is it that
            any given trial has 6 or more raindrops on a square?” Another question that
            we were able to gain data on from the Fathom simulations was “How many
            squares in any given trial are likely to contain exactly 2 raindrops?” This manner
            of generating questions, along with the student comments that picked up on
            the variability inherent in the supporting data, was a highlight for the results
            of the project so far.



                                                               204 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220