Page 421 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6

CPS2007 Jai-Hua Yen et al.
References
1. Burg, S., Rixen, C., Stöckli, V. & Wipf, S. (2015). Observation bias and its
causes in botanical surveys on high‐alpine summits. Journal of
Vegetation Science 26, 191–200.
2. Burnham, K. P., & Overton, W. S. (1978). Estimation of the size of a
closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals.
Biometrika 65(3), 625-633.
3. Carvalheiro, L. G., Veldtman, R., Shenkute, A. G., Tesfay, G. B., Pirk, C. W.
W., Donaldson, J. S., & Nicolson, S. W. (2011). Natural and within‐
farmland biodiversity enhances crop productivity. Ecology letters 14(3),
251-259.
4. Chao, A. (1984). Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in
a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11, 265-270.
5. Chao, A. (1987). Estimating the population size for capture-recapture
data with unequal catchability. Biometrics, 43, 783-791.
6. Garibaldi, L. A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Winfree, R., Aizen, M. A., Bommarco,
R., Cunningham, S. A., ... & Bartomeus, I. (2013). Wild pollinators
enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science
339(6127), 1608-1611.
7. Morrison, LW. (2015). Observer error in vegetation surveys: a review.
Journal of Plant Ecology 9, 367–379.
8. Vittoz, P. & Guisan, A. (2007). How reliable is the monitoring of
permanent vegetation plots? A test with multiple observers. Journal of
Vegetation Science 18, 413–422

410 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9