Page 177 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 1
P. 177

IPS129 Claudia V. et al.
                Observing the mismatch between crime and its fear and the relevance it
            has at a social and political level, warrants further investigations of the aspects
            which  might  affect  the  personal  perception  of  crime.  For  instance,
            demographic factors (such as age or gender), local factors (if it is a dark or
            crowded street) and others, such as the amount and style of media coverage
            of  crime.  How  then  should  the  mismatch  between  crime  and  its  fear  be
            explained and how does the fear of crime emerge as a social phenomenon?
            Furthermore, how can policies be designed to tackle this complex social issue
            if it is not clearly understood? Having data or observations to validate the
            analysis would be ideal, however, at an individual scale, it is almost impossible
            to measure the impact that suffering a crime has compared to the impact of
            other aspects of fear (for instance, hearing that a neighbour suffered a crime
            as  opposed  to  being  the  actual  victim  of  that  crime).  Observations  at  an
            individual scale are typically based on victimisation surveys, which frequently
            do not track the fears of the same individuals over time.
             Fig.2. Social Decay or Incivilities rate (2002/2016)   In  Italy,  we  observe  a  widespread  fear  of
                                             crime  and  risk  of  victimisation  that  has
                                             pushed  crime  to  the  top  of  the  political
                                             agenda. In this context, it would be crucial
                                             to be able to  answer, to  name but a few,

                                                         Fig.3 – Concrete fear rate (2009/2016)



            questions  like  ‘What  is  the  relative
            seriousness  of  different  crimes?’,    ‘How
            much do people spend for fear of crime?’.
            We need to consider the further source of
            distortions represented by the (incautious
            use of) official crime statistics, which being
            affected  by  a  variable  underreporting  bias  across  offences  can  induce
            misperception about the effective crime rates and generate false myths as to
            what offence is on the rise. As is well known, reported crimes represent just
            the tip of a (sometimes big) iceberg. We said before that criminal activities
            have a  strong impact on the community, but of  course it is reasonable to
            expect that different types of crime produce different social costs.











                                                               166 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182