Page 306 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 306

IPS246 Oscar Gasca Brito
                  4. Discussion and conclusions
                     Well-being must be measured where it matters. The characteristics of a
                  region or city can strongly affect the well-being of the people who live there.
                  Improving people's lives requires that their region be a better place and the
                  availability of solid welfare measures is crucial for such improvement. In this
                  sense, indicators at the national level on material conditions and quality of life
                  can be misleading and hide important disparities between regions and cities
                                          4
                  within the same country . In addition, many of the policies that most directly
                  affect people's lives are local or regional and, therefore, require indicators at
                  this scale.
                     However, we still have a way to go and in an international context where
                  we  can  access  more  and  more  information  more  quickly,  we  have  several
                  challenges such as statistical institutes that resolve:
                  ·      On the one hand, how to make the SDGs, OECD indicators and national
                  initiatives compatible? Users can be saturated with indicators and information
                  as well as the level of disaggregation of each one. Among all the initiatives,
                  there  may  be  more  than  80  indicators  without  counting  territorial
                  disaggregation, by sex, by age, etc. It is imperative for international as well as
                  national organizations to design a simple and user-friendly indicator system
                  for  the  population  as  a  whole,  regardless  of  the  level  of  disaggregation
                  required.
                     ·  On the other hand, we have to keep focus on users, this factor is very
                        important to better understand their information needs or if additional
                        indicators  are  required.  The  timely  updating  of  indicators,  since  the
                        timed  release  of  the  data  is  the  success  factor  of  the  information
                        generated.  Having  internationally  comparable  indicators,  in  order  to
                        compare the different public policies among OECD countries and their
                        regions in terms of Well-being.
                     ·  Finally,  to  have  more  information  at  urban  and  rural  level,  given  the
                        importance  of  having  the  decision-making  increasingly  accurate  and
                        closer to the people. Think globally; act locally, but for this you need to
                        have that information. For this, it is necessary to exploit other sources of
                        information such as administrative records, big data, etc. to be able to
                        measure well-being on a smaller scale in order to help local government
                        with their policies.










                    OECD (2014) Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being http://www.oecd-
                  4
                  ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-guidelines-on-measuring-subjective-well-being 9789264191655-en
                                                                     293 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311