Page 429 - Invited Paper Session (IPS) - Volume 2
P. 429

IPS307 Tjeerd Jellema et al.
            incentives to seek to generate corporate income in those countries where their
            tax  liability  would  be  minimised.  The  OECD  tax  database  [OECD2019b]
            provides relevant data, comparing corporate income tax rates of individual
            OECD countries, and tracing these over time. Table 1 summarises the available
            information for 2010 and 2018, with the same country grouping as presented
            earlier.

                                                                Change     2018    2018
                                             2010       2018
                                                               2010-2018  Minimum Maximum
                       SPE Concentrating         22.3   18.8   -3.5     9.0       26.0
             European   countries                25.0   22.0   -3.0     15.0      34.4
             Union
                       Other                     39.2   25.8   -13.4
                       United States             39.5   29.7   -9.8
             OECD less   Japan                   25.0   25.0   0.0
             EU
                       Other OECD
            Source: OECD

                The  table  conveys  several  messages.  First,  a  number  of  countries  have
            considered it necessary to significantly lower their corporate income tax rates
            since 2010, which will have a potential impact on corporate tax strategies. Not
            only the US with its recent tax reform, but also Japan, and European countries
            have significantly lower corporate tax rates in 2018 compared to 2010. Second,
            EU SPE concentrating countries differ strongly, some clearly adopted a low tax
            strategy (as have some nonSPE concentrating countries) whereas others are
            above median values of non-SPE concentrating countries. Headline income
            tax rates do not seem to be the unique responsible factor for concentrations
            of SPEs in Europe.

            4.  Measurement and quality
                The ECB fact finding [ECB 2017] assessed how relevant SPEs were for the
            overall i.i.p. Three SPE concentrating countries responding to the survey (see
            Table 2 below) indicated that SPEs accounted for more than half of the i.i.p.
            total assets. Other responding countries listed between 0 and 10 percent. To
            a  very  large  degree,  the  assets  belong  to  the  functional  category  of  FDI,
            although portfolio and other investment, and financial derivative assets were
            also reported. Similarly, FDI was also prevalent on the liability side, but not so
            exclusively. For example the Netherlands and Luxembourg reported significant
            amounts as portfolio and other investment. There is thus a large impact of
            SPEs on the total i.i.p. of SPE concentrating countries and consequently the
            accurate and consistent recording of SPEs transactions and positions is highly
            relevant  for  the  quality  of  the  national  b.o.p./i.i.p.  as  well  as  for  European
            aggregates.



                                                               416 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434