Page 213 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 2
P. 213

STS486 Tonio D.B. et al.
                Starting from these considerations, simultaneous confidence bands for the
            mean  diversity  profile  function  are  obtained  using  a  bootstrap  procedure.
            Since diversity profiles are constrained functions, our proposal consists in pre-
            processing diversity profiles via a differential equation method (Ramsay, 1998)
            and bootstrapping the unconstrained functions. This allows us to respect the
            characteristics of the diversity profile and to work in an appropriate functional
                              2
            space, that is the   space.
                The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a brief review of the
            diversity profile evaluation in a functional context focusing on the estimation
            of  constrained  curves.  The  section  continues  with  the  construction  of
            bootstrap simultaneous confidence bands for the functional mean estimator.
            Section  4  deals  with  an  application  to  a  real  dataset  concerning  fish
            biodiversity in Lazio rivers (Italy) and Section 5 concludes the paper.

            2.  Methodology: FDA approach for evaluating diversity profiles
                Diversity profile are functions of the abundance vector, whose knowledge
            requires a census of the population under study, which is unfeasible in most
            cases (Barabesi and Fattorini, 1998).
                Let us suppose that an ecological population is composed of N units and
                                                                      T
            is  partitioned  into  s  species  j=1,2,...,s.  Let  N=(N1,,...,Ns)   be  the  species
            abundance  vector  whose  generic  element  Nj  represents  the  number  of
            individuals belonging to the j-th species, and let p=(p1,...,ps)  be the relative
                                                                        T
                                                                           s
                                            s
            abundance  vector  with  pj=Pj/∑ j=1Nj  such  that  0≤pj≤  1  and  ∑ j=1pj=1.  The
            abundances  must  be  estimated  by  means  of  a  sample  survey,  following  a
            model-based or a design-based approach. The latter is widely applied in an
            ecological context, because it considers the values of a variable of interest as
            fixed quantities and the selection probabilities, introduced with the design, are
            used  in  defining  the  properties  of  the  estimators,  without  making  any
            assumptions about the population (Thompson, 1992).
                Let us suppose that abundance data have been collected from a biological
            community. Then, for each i-th sample unit (habitat, environmental site, etc.),
            i=1,2,...,n, a diversity profile ∆ix can be obtained. Since diversity profiles are
            presented as curves, they may be represented in a functional framework as
            follows (Gattone and Di Battista, 2009):
                                              ∆ () =  () +  ()       ∈ ,  = 1,2, … ,                             (2)
                              
                                       
                                              
            where  () is an arbitrary smooth function; and  () denotes an unknown
                    
                                                              
            independent  zero-mean  error  term.  Usually,  the  functional  form  of  the
            diversity profile,  (),can be reconstructed from the observed raw sampled
                             
            data  points  {∆ :   ∈ }  using  basis  function  expansion  and  smoothing
                            
            (Ramsay and Silverman, 2005). However, diversity profiles are a special case of
            functional data in that they are non-negative, convex and decreasing curves.

                                                               202 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218