Page 352 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 352

STS550 Angelia L. Grant et al.
                  models  is  that  consumption  patterns  tend  to  depend  on  those  in  recent
                  periods, consistent with habit-forming preferences.
                      The main advantage of autoregressive models is that they perform well at
                  modelling persistence. On the other hand, the disadvantage is that they do
                  not use any other information, such as relative price movements. Each model
                  is estimated using ordinary least squares regressions.
                      The autoregressive models do not account for changes in relative prices,
                  which can drive important shifts in the share of each consumption component.
                  As such, the next models considered are regressions on the relative price of
                  the  consumption  component.  The  main  advantage  of  relative  price
                  regressions  is  that  they  take  into  account  information  about  relative  price
                  shifts. A disadvantage is that they do not include dynamics in the form of past
                  consumption shares.
                      The almost ideal demand system (AIDS) of Deaton and Muellbauer (1980)
                  takes  into  account  that  the  consumption  of  a  particular  good  or  service
                  depends not only on its own price, but also the relative prices of other goods
                  and services which may be either complements or substitutes. It also takes
                  into account an income effect, with each of the shares depending on total
                  consumption expenditure. The main advantage of the almost ideal demand
                  system  is  its  strong  theoretical  grounding.  But  this  strong  theoretical
                  grounding may mean that the model may be too restricted to fit the data well.
                  In addition, the model has a large number of parameters.

                  3.  Forecast Combination Approach
                      There are two methods used to construct the forecast combinations. The
                  first method uses equal weights. The simple combination approach is often
                  found  to  outperform  other  more  sophisticated  combination  schemes.  The
                  second method weights the forecasts using past forecast performance. More
                  specifically,  each  of  the  models  for  each  of  the  household  consumption
                  components is weighted using a four-quarter rolling weight of the inverse of
                  the sum of the squared forecast error. The four-quarter rolling weight strikes
                  a balance between having relatively stable weights and weights that quickly
                  adapt when there is a change in performance across models.
                      The approach of combining forecasts based on past forecast performance
                  accounts  for  changes  in  modelling  performance.  That  is,  it  captures  the
                  benefits  of  different  modelling  approaches  and  accounts  for  the  fact  that
                  certain models can improve or diminish in performance over particular time
                  periods and at different forecasting horizons.

                  4.  Forecasting Results
                      This section reports the out-of-sample forecasting results for each of the
                  models and for the forecast combinations. The out-of-sample forecasting is

                                                                     341 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357