Page 78 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 1
P. 78

CPS1085 Manoj C.
                  that    the     prior    distributions   of     |  ∼  ( ,   ),  |  ∼
                                                                                  2
                                                                                  1
                                                                              01
                                                                     1
                                                                  1
                                                                                         2
                                                                                      2
                                                          2
                               2
                          2
                   ( ,   ),   ∼  Inverse Gamma(, ),   ∼  Inverse Gamma(, ) and   ∼
                                                          2
                               1
                          2
                      02
                   (−1, 1). Thus the joint prior distribution of  = ( ,   ,  ,   , ) is given by
                                                                       2
                                                                          1
                                                                             2
                                                                   1

                                                1           
                            ( ,  ,  ,  , ) =             1 −2−1 −2−1
                                                                          
                                    1
                                       2
                                  2
                               1
                                                                           2
                                              2  Γ()2 −1  Γ()2 −1
                                                 1 2
                                               −1  −         −  02  2    
                                                                 2
                                                     1
                                                                  {(  01 2  ) +  +  }.
                                                           ) + (
                                                2      1         2      1 2   2 2

                  Then the joint posterior density of θ given data is obtained as

                                                            ()()
                                             ∗
                                             (|) =         .                                     (6)
                                                         ∫ ()()
                                                           

                  It is not possible to compute the Bayes estimates explicitly. Thus we propose
                  importance sampling method to find the Bayes estimators for . we consider
                  the sequential importance sampling method to generate samples from the
                  posterior distribution and then find the Bayes estimate of  (see, Tokdar and
                  Kass, 2010). We also construct HPD interval under SEL for R as described in
                  Chen and Shao (1999).

                  3.  Results
                  3.1 Simulation Study
                     In this section, we carry out a simulation study to asses the performance of
                  different estimators developed in previous sections. First we obtain the MLE
                  of  using (5) for different combinations of  ,    and  by fixing  = 1  and
                                                                 2
                                                                                   1
                                                              1
                   = 1. We have obtained the bias and MSE of MLEs. The bootstrap CI for  is
                   2
                  also obtained. The average interval length (AIL) and coverage probability (CP)
                  are also obtained. For the simulation study for Bayes estimators we took the
                  hyper parameters  01  = 2,  02  = 2,   =  2,   =  2,   =  2 and   =  2. We have
                  obtained the Bayes estimators for  of BVND under SEL, LL (with h=1) and EL
                  (with q=1) functions.
                     We repeat the simulation procedure for different values of  ,   ,  and
                                                                                     2
                                                                                  1
                    =  10, 15, 20 .  The  bias  and  MSE  of  Bayes  estimators  for  different
                  combinations of  ,    and  are obtained. The AIL and CP for HPD interval
                                       2
                                    1
                  are  also  obtained.  Based  on  the  simulation  studies  we  have  the  following
                  results.
                      1.  The  bias  and  MSE  of  all  estimators  decrease  when  the  number  of
                         uncensored observations  increases.
                      2.  Bias and MSE of Bayes estimators are smaller than that of MLEs.
                      3.  Among the Bayes estimators,  estimator  under SEL function possess
                         minimum bias and MSE when   ≠   and estimator under EL function
                                                            2
                                                       1
                         possess minimum bias and MSE when   =  .
                                                                     2
                                                                1
                                                                      67 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83