Page 63 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 63

CPS 2126 Dr. Rajkumari Sanatombi Devi et.al
            Two items each were having 0 and negative discriminating power in the study.
            These 4 items need to be completely removed in the construction of test items.
            In  a  study  of  MCQs  having  5  options,  the  mean  score  was  27.31  ±  5.75
            (maximum 50 marks). Mean Dif I-value and DI were 54.14 ± 17.48 and 0.356
            ±  0.17,  respectively.  Seventy  eight  per  cent  items  were  of  recommended
            difficulty with mean 51.44 ± 11.11. Sixty two per cent items had excellent DI
            (0.465 ± 0.083) (Hingorjo & Jaleel, 2012). The mean Dif I and DI were higher in
            their study as compared with the present study but the variability in both Dif
            I and DI were higher in the present study. In the present study, the relationship
            between Dif I and DI was not in linear. It was in curvilinear form.  Pearson
            correlation coefficient “r” showed a significant positive correlation between
            these two indices and the strength of correlation was strong (r = 0.51, P =
            0.001). However, a wide scattering of dots were observed between the test
            items which indicate the guessing practice done by the students. Suruchi and
            Rana (2014) found that out of 120, one very difficult and seven very easy test
            items  were  rejected  for  the  final  draft  of  achievement  test  based  on  the
            difficulty  index.  Fourteen  items  were  found  to  be  good,  2  items  needed
            improvement and 6 items which fell below 0.20 of discriminating index were
            rejected. One item was found to have zero discriminating power and none of
            the test item showed negative discrimination. However, in their study no wide
            scattering  data  points  was  observed  which  was  in  contrast  of  the  present
            study.  Thus,  9  items  were  recommended  to  reject  for  the  final  draft  of
            achievement test. In their study, the relationship between Dif I and DI was a
            moderate negatively correlated (r = - 0.3711). Mitra et a.l, (2009) reported that
            difficulty  and  discrimination  indices  are  reciprocally  related  and  poor
            correlation  was  observed  in  their  study.  Kheyami  et  al.,  (2018)  found  a
            significant  dome-shaped  correlation  between  DIF  I  and  DI  (r  =  0.162;  P  =
            0.010),  with  the  highest  DIs  occurring  in  the  acceptable  DIF  I  range  and
            decreasing for DIF Is in the difficult range which is similar with the finding of
            the present study.

            6.  Conclusion
                The finding of the study signifies about the importance of item analysis in
            the selection of a reliable and validity test items in a multiple-choice types
            questions.  Based  on  the  difficulty  index  of  the  test  items,  31  items  that
            comprised of 14 good and 17 best items were retained, and 4 difficulties and
            3  very  easy  items  were  rejected.  Discriminating  power  of  the  test  items
            indicates that 10 excellent, 6 good and 11 mediocre items were retained, and
            7 poor items need to be revised due to the poor discriminating power of the
            test items. The reasons of the poor discriminating power may be due to the
            confusing  meaning  of  the  options  used  test  items.  Sixteen  items  can  be
            considered as ideal test items based on 10 excellent and 6 good items. Two

                                                                52 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68