Page 67 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 67

CPS2128  Wlodzimierz Okrasa et al.
            1.  Introduction
                There are several reasons for focusing on community and individual well-
            being relationships, especially in the local development context. Many of them
            have been recognized and discussed thoroughly in the literature, challenging
            the tradition of using GDP and other economic indicators as measures of social
            progress, (Stiglitz et al., 2009), while including subjective values based self-
            reported  feeling  about  selected  aspects  of  wellbeing  in  connection  with
            community,  eg.  Phillip  and  Wong  (2017)  .  In  the  presented  modelling
            approach,  an  empirical  application  is  preceded  by  discussion  of  the
            measurement  and  data  issues,  including  problem  of  creation  an  analytical
            multi-source database (through 'bottom up' integration of units from different
            surveys)  and  construction  of  the  major  wellbeing  measures:  (i)
            multidimensional  index  of  local  deprivation  encompassing  eleven
            components , each of them being constructed from public-use data file (Local
            Data Bank, Statistics Poland), using 'confirmatory' version of factor analysis (for
            all  2478  communes  (gminas)),  and  (ii)  individual  (subjective)  well-being
            measure derived from the nation-wide Time Use Survey which is substituted
            in some contexts by self-reported measures from national surveys on Social
            Cohesion  or Social  Diagnosis).  An  important  methodological  question  that
            arises in modeling the processes underlying cross-level relationships in the
            spatial perspective concerns the omitting variable. Since it can be associated
            with both micro- (or 'response' variable) and macro- (or predictors) level, the
            issue of endogeneity becomes troublesome and demands the evaluation of
            possible  effect  of  the crucial  omitted  variable.  Two  aspects  of  this  issue  is
            considered  here.  On  the  one  hand,  it  is  hypothesized  that  the  level  of
            community  deprivation (or well-being) is a mediating factor that modify the
            way in which the residents' material status (income) affects  the individual
            (subjective)  well-being.    A  path  analytic  version  of  structural  model  is
            employed  to  decompose  total  effect  of  the  independent  variable  into  the
            natural direct and indirect effects (Hong, 2015; Okrasa and Rozkrut, 2018). On
            the other hand, social capital - indicated by the intensity of the third sector
            organizations' presence in a community - can be interpreted as the amount of
            money  required  to  compensate  a  person  for  a  possible  loss  in  utility  (for
            instance, like when price is rising). The 'compensating variation' approach to
            social capital allows to identify the utility gain derived from a unit increase in
            social  capital  (Anand  and  Montovani,  2018,  Okrasa,  2018).  Following
            exploration  of  spatial  patterning,  clustering  and  spatial  dependence  (with
            GeoDa procedures - Fischer and Getis, 2010) a direct assessment of the spatial
            interaction effect on the cross-level relationships is also attempted  (Patuelli
            and Arbia, 2016) using flow-type data from between-community migration
            public  statistics.  In  conclusions,  a  spatially  integrated  approach  to  vertical
            (multilevel) and horizontal (across areal units) relationships between individual

                                                                56 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72