Page 152 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 4
P. 152

STS571 Ossi Nurmi et al.
                     The figure presents the number of outbound trips to each country based
                  on the Finnish Travel –survey as well as the upper and lower bounds of the
                  95% confidence interval for the survey estimates. The number of trips based
                  on  MNO  data  is  plotted  against  them  as  a  line  graph.  Using  this  kind  of
                  method, the MNO data provides a ‘second opinion’ to the survey confidence
                  intervals for each country. In case the MNO trips are outside of the confidence
                  interval  for  a  certain  country,  the  MNO  data  most  likely  includes  serious
                  sources of over- or underestimation for that country. On the other hand, the
                  survey estimates also become rather useless if the 95% confidence interval is
                  too  large.  At  present,  countries  with  less  than  170,000  trips  have  95%
                  confidence interval limits of plus or minus 30 per cent. For most of such small
                  destination countries, the MNO trips can still provide a better estimate, given
                  that the MNO trips are within the confidence interval.
                     There  are  currently  only  24  destination  countries  where  the  annual
                  estimates are considered reliable. On a monthly level, only trips to Estonia and
                  Sweden are mostly reliable. In total there are 9 million outbound trips to these
                  countries. The MNO data can potentially provide trips to 129 more smaller
                  destination countries with 1,5 million trips in total.

                  6.  Discussion and Conclusion
                      In  the  context  of  outbound  tourism,  the  strengths  and  weaknesses  of
                  mobile positioning and survey data can be summarized as follows:

                   Table 1 – Strengths and weaknesses of survey and mobile positioning data

                                  Finnish Travel -survey         Mobile positioning data

                   Strengths      Scope is clean: only tourism   Granularity: millions of
                                  trips are included             observations covering
                                  Provides supporting            nearly all destination
                                  information of the trip (ie.   countries
                                  purpose of trip, expenditure,   Monthly seasonality of
                                  means of transport and         tourism is more accurate.
                                  accommodation)
                   Weaknesses  Granularity; very few             Scope is not clean, there
                                  observations per year,         are many sources of over-
                                  covering only a few            or underestimation
                                  destination countries
                                                                 No supporting
                                  Monthly seasonality            information of the trip
                                  estimates are affected by
                                  randomness



                                                                     141 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157