Page 105 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 105

CPS2134 Yutaka Kuroki et al.
            We could estimate the covariance matrix of the sample errors by
                                                             
                     1                                      1
                                                                                  ′
                                               ′
                 ̂ =  ∑  ̂ ,    ̂ = (̂ , … , ̂ ) ,   ( ̂) =  ∑( ̂ −  ̂) ( ̂ −  ̂) ,
                                              2           
                       =1                                   =1
            and then use sampling theory to test whether all the errors are jointly zero.
            See Cochrane (2005).
                                                        2
                                         ′
                                                −1
                                         ̂ ( ̂)  ̂ ∼  −1 .
            In the case of this study, the p-value of the above test statistic is 0.534 and it
            shows the errors are not significantly different from zero.

                Table  2  shows  estimated  coefficients  of  each  factor  and  tests.  GMM
            estimator’s asymptotic normality let us construct confidence bands for  the
            estimator  and  conduct  different  tests.  In  the  case  of  this  data,  MKT  likely
            explains the numbers of customers. However, SMB seems to be a redundant
            factor,  but  SMR  estimator  is  significant  in  café/sweets,  dining  bar,
            karaoke/party and “other”.

            3.  Discussion and Conclusion
                We investigated he factor models for number of customers of restaurants
            in Japan. As well as finance, risk analysis is a useful tool for identifying and
            assessing the risks of retail demands. In particular, the demand for retail stores
            is strongly affected by calendar effect and it cannot be dispersed because it is
            a systematic risk. As a result, we showed there are another systematic risk of
            demand for restaurants besides the calendar effect and suggested a probable
            factor model based on it.
                                 Table 2. Results of GMM estimate
                    restaurant genre             MKT            SMB           SMR
                          asian                  0.064         -0.03          0.046
                       bar/cocktail              0.103*        0.046*        -0.019
                       café/sweets               0.081*        -0.009         0.06*
                     creative cuisine            0.132*        -0.008         0.049
                       dining bar                0.147*        0.012         -0.046*
                   international cuisine         0.155*        -0.023         0.047
                      italian/french             0.149*        0.028          0.013
                         izakaya                 0.178*        -0.001        -0.053
                      Korean food                0.145*         0.01         -0.019
                      karaoke/party              0.153*        -0.07         -0.197*
              okonomiyaki/monja/teppanya         0.113*        0.072          0.011
                           ki
                      western food               0.118*        0.007          0.025
                  yakiniku/Korean food           0.182*        0.031         -0.052
                       other genre               0.098*        0.028         0.052*
                                      * p-value significant at 5%

                                                                94 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110