Page 312 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 6

CPS1937 Xu Sun et al.
6. Moses T, Holland P W. (2010). A comparison of statistical selection
strategies for univariate and bivariate log-linear models. British Journal
of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 63(3):557.
7. Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating
community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.
8. Newman, M. E. J. (2006a). Modularity and community structure in
networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 103(23), 8577–8582.
9. Newman, M. E J.(2006b). Finding community structure in networks using
the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E, 74(3):036104.
10. Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Newman, M. E. J., & Friend, A. J. (2007).
Community structure in the United States House of representatives.
Physica A, 386, 414–438.
11. Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2005). Uncovering the
overlap-ping community structure of complex networks in nature and
society. Nature, 435(7043), 814–818.
12. Tibshirani R. (2011). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a
retrospective . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 73(3):273-282.
13. Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and
applications. New York: Cambridge.
14. Yuan Y, Huan Qi, Xiang-En Hu. (2011). Data Mining of Contingence Table
Based on Multinomial Processing Tree Model. Computer Engineering,
37(11):10-12.

301 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9