Page 418 - Special Topic Session (STS) - Volume 3
P. 418

STS552 Natalia Nehrebecka
                  The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005) points to the importance of
                  adequate  estimates  for  economic  downturns  and  unexpected  losses.  The
                                                                            1
                  purpose of this research is forecasting the recovery rate of non-financial
                  corporations with particular emphasis on sectorial analysis. The company’s
                  industry  and  its  characteristics  have  an  impact  on  the  loss  given  default.  In
                  addition,  a  research  hypothesis  has  been  put  forward  that  assumes  that
                  enterprises operating in industries where the market is small have higher losses
                  in  the  event  of  the  company’s  insolvency  due  to  the  lack  of  active  bidders’
                  market. If the market is not liquid, it is more difficult for creditors to recover the
                  amounts due, and the time may be increased until they are collected.
                     Research on the Loss Given Default began to gain momentum only in the
                  21st century. Most empirical work on LGD for loans began to arise after the
                  introduction of the New Capital Accord in 2004. In the first works on modelling
                  losses due to default [Altman, Gande and Saunders 2003; Arner, Cantor, Emery
                  2004; Cantora and Varmy 2010] linear regression was used. The Basel Committee
                  on Banking Supervision (2005) points to the importance of adequate estimates
                  for  economic  downturns  and  unexpected  losses.  Board  of  Governors  of  the
                  Federal  Reserve  System  (2006)  proposes  the  computation  of  Downturn  LGD
                  measures by a linear transformation of means [Dowturn LGD = 0,08 + 0,092 * E
                  (LGD)].  Most  academic  and  practical  credit  risk  models  focus  on  mean  LGD
                  predictions.  However  if  we  consider  two  loans  with  different  distributions  (a
                  uniform and a beta) but the same means values then we have real quantiles and
                  downturns  as  well  as  unexpected  losses  differ.  A  relatively  new  method  for
                  modelling the loss given default, which was also used in this research, is quantile
                  regression [Somersa and Whittaker 2007; Krüger and Rösch 2017]. While other
                  methods only allow estimating the mean or variance of LGD, quantile regression
                  allows modelling of all quantiles of the dependent variable. In this way, it is easy
                  to obtain measures in the event of a downturn and unexpected losses.
                     The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the
                  methodology. Section 3 presents and discusses the empirical results, while
                  Section 4 concludes the paper.

                  2.  Methodology
                      In order to calculate the LGD parameter, the Recovery Rate (RR) should be
                  initially estimated. RR is defined as one minus any impairment loss that has
                  occurred  on  assets  dedicated  to  that  contract  (see  IAS  36,  Impairment  of
                  Assets)  /  Exposure  at  Default.  Most  LGDs  are  nearly  total  losses  or  total



                  1  Recovery Rate given default is the part of the loan liabilities that a creditor can recover from
                  the debtor in the event that the debtor defaults.


                                                                     407 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423