Page 136 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2
P. 136

CPS1461 Michal P. et. al
                  normalized test statistic allows us  to omit the variance estimation and the
                  bootstrap technique overcomes the estimation of the correlation structure.
                  Hence, neither nuisance nor smoothing parameters are present in the whole
                  testing process, which makes it very simple for practical use. Moreover, the
                  whole stochastic theory behind requires relatively simple assumptions, which
                  are not too restrictive. The whole setup can be also modified by considering a
                  large  panel  size  accounting  also  for  situations  with  T  tending  to  infinity.
                  Consequently, the whole theory would lead to convergences to functionals of
                  Gaussian processes with a covariance structure derived in a similar fashion as
                  for fixed and small T.

                  References
                  1.  J. Bai (2010): Common breaks in means and variances for panel data. J.
                      Econometrics, 157, 78–92.
                  2.  B.H. Baltagi, Q. Feng, and C. Kao (2016): Estimation of heterogeneous
                      panels with structural breaks. J. Econometrics, 191, 176–195.
                  3.  J. Chan, L. Horváth, and M. Hus ̌ková (2013): Change-point detection in
                      panel data.´ J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 143, 955–970.
                  4.  L. Horváth, and M. Hus ̌ková (2012): Change-point detection in panel
                      data. J. Time Series Anal., 33, 631–648.
                  5.  D. Kim (2011): Estimating a common deterministic time trend break in
                      large panels with cross section dependence. J. Econometrics, 164, 310–
                      330.
                  6.  M. Maciak, B. Pes ̌tová, and M. Pes ̌ta (2018): Structural breaks in
                      dependent, heteroscedastic, and extremal panelˇ data. Kybernetika, 54,
                      1106–1121.
                  7.  M. Pesaran (2006): Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous
                      panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74, 967–1012.
                  8.  M. Pes ̌ta and M. Wendler (2018): Nuisance parameters free changepoint
                      detection in non-stationary series. arXiv:1808.01905.
                  9.  B. Pes ̌tová and M. Pes ̌ta (2015): Testing structural changes in panel data
                      with small fixed panel size and bootstrap. Metrika, 78, 665–689.
                  10.  B. Pes ̌tová and M. Pes ̌ta (2017): Change point estimation in panel data
                      without boundary issue. Risks, 5, 7.
                  11.  J. Qian and L. Su (2016): Shrinkage estimation of regression models with
                      multiple structural changes. Econometric Theory, 32, 1376–1433.
                  12.  S. De Watcher and E. Tzavalis (2012): Detection of structural breaks in
                      linear dynamic panel data models. Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 56, 3020–
                      3034.





                                                                     125 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141