Page 69 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 2

CPS1428 Enobong F. U.
20. Malcom, D., Roseboom, J. ,Clark, C.(1959). Application of a technique for
Research and Development Program Evaluation. Operations Research
7, 646-669.
21. McCombs, Edward L. Elam, Matthew, E., and Pratt, David B.(2009).
Estimating Task duration in PERT using the Weibull Probability
Distribution. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 8, No. 1,
282-288.
22. Mohan, S., Gopalakrishnan, M.,Balasubramanian, H., Chandrashekar, A.
(2007). A Lognormal Approximation of Activity Duration in PERT Using
Two Time Estimates. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 58,
827-831.
23. Moder. J., Phillips, C. and Davis, E. (1983). Project Management with
CPM, PERT, and Precedence Diagramming, 3rd edition, Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York.
24. Moder, J. J. and Rodgers, E. G. (1968). Judgement Estimates of the
Moments of PERT Type Distributions. Management Science. 15; 76-83.
25. Parks, W. and Ramsing, K. (1969). The Use of Compound Poisson in
PERT. Management Science. Vol. 15, No. 8.
26. PMBOK (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge.
4 Ed., Project Management Institute Inc., USA.
th
27. Premachandra M. (2001).An Approximation of The Activity Duration
Distribution in PERT.Computing and Operations Research. 28; 443-452.
28. Shankar, N. Ravi and Sireesha, V(2009). An Approximation for the
Activity Duration distribution, Supporting Original PERT. Applied
Mathematical Sciences, 57, 3, 2823-2834.
29. Tadikamalla, P. R. (1980). A look at the Burr and related distributions.
International Statist. Rev. 48, 337-344.
30. Tavares, L. (2002). A Review of the Contribution of Operational Research
to Project Management. European Journal of Operational Research. 136,
1-18.
31. Trietsch, Dan;Mazmanyan, Lilit; Gevorgyan, Lilit; Baker, Kenneth R. (2012);
Modeling Activity Times by the Parkinson distribution with a Lognormal
Core: Theory and Validation. European Journal Of operational Research
216, 386-396.

58 | I S I W S C 2 0 1 9