Page 420 - Contributed Paper Session (CPS) - Volume 4
P. 420

CPS2476 Tite Habiyakare et al.
                        Table 2: Recruitment costs of return migrant workers with non-zero
                  values on both costs and earnings (in USD*) by sex, geographic location, last
                              country of destination (corridors), and skill levels (**)
                     Selected   Frequency,   Recruitment costs (mean, USD)    Proportion in monthly
                    variables    return MW                               earnings abroad
                              (person, %)    Total    Male    Female    Total    Male    Female
                      Total      52,639     141.31    141.35    141.27    0.33    0.32    0.33
                                               Geographic location

                     Urban        20.3      92.00    109.91    71.26    0.22    0.23    0.20
                      Rural       79.7      151.62    147.38    157.61    0.35    0.35    0.36
                                              Country of destination
                                                   (corridor)
                    Thailand      94.4      138.04    136.85    139.59    0.33    0.32    0.33
                     Others       5.6       247.82    231.00    450.78    0.36    0.33    0.67
                                                   Skill levels

                   High-skilled    0.7      482.07     -     482.07    1.00    -     1.00
                   Low-skilled    99.3      141.08    141.35    140.71    0.33    0.32    0.33
                  Source:  Authors calculations based on LFS data from the 2017 labour force survey of Lao PDR.
                           Notes:  (*) = September 2017 UN exchange rate: 1 USD = 8,297.500 LAK.
                   (**) = Estimated by educational levels in this paper as in ISCO-08 (ILO, 2012); the ideal should
                                                 be by occupations abroad.
                                              (-) = Denotes zero value.
                                          (MW) = Denotes migrant worker.

                      One notes that return migrant workers in Lao PDR were mostly low-skilled
                  (99.3 per cent) and were mostly living in rural areas (79.7 per cent). Therefore,
                  statistics  presented  in  Table  2  are  not  reliable  for  high-skilled  and  urban
                  workers due to small sample size. However, one can note that recruitment
                  costs seem to be higher for rural than for urban migrant worker, and are likely
                  to be higher for high skilled than for low-skilled return migrant workers (in the
                  Lao PDR context).

                  4.  Discussion and Conclusion
                      Despite  possible  issues  with  the  small  sample  size,  Lao  PDR  LFS  2017
                  provides an insight and data on the labour migration process in and from Lao
                  PDR, and on recruitment costs: return migrants were estimated at 208,500
                  persons, and only 25.2 per cent of them (52,600 persons) were return migrant
                  workers as currently defined in the SDG indicator 10.7.1 Guidelines. The main
                  destination country of Laotian migrant workers is Thailand: about 94.4 per cent
                  of return migrant workers in 2017 were coming back from Thailand.
                      The recruitment costs of return migrant workers as a proportion of their
                  monthly earnings is estimated at 33 per cent, with no significant differences
                  between women (33 per cent) and men (32 per cent). Laotian return migrant
                  workers were mostly found in rural areas and were predominantly low-skilled

                                                                     409 | I S I   W S C   2 0 1 9
   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425